Showing posts with label Strategy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Strategy. Show all posts

Monday, December 14, 2009

Gold: Bursting Bubble?

Following an impressive 20% gain in just 2 months, gold has dropped $100/oz in the past two weeks. I've seen a number of pundits come out recently stating that gold prices are much too high, gold is a bubble, and/or a significant decline is coming. Some of these comments are coming from the very individuals who've tried calling the top in gold a number of times over the last 5 years, during which time gold has appreciated 200%. Compare that return to the stock or bond markets.



Looking below at the 10-year chart of gold you see price action typical of a long-term secular bull market. Sharp climbs are followed by some retracement and consolidation. This 9-year (so far) bull market has experienced a number of year-long periods of stagnation or decline. The fact that we're experiencing some profit taking after the recent run shouldn't surprise anyone. This is normal and healthy.



So is the current decline a temporary shake-out of weak hands, the beginning of a more significant decline, or the beginning of a period of extended consolidation? Only time will tell, but it's unlikely that the secular bull market in gold has just seen its peak. We've been using the current pullback as an opportunity to once again boost our exposure.

Until the trend of global monetary and political mismanagement is convincingly reversed, there is little reason to sell our precious metals position. Annual gold production has been in decline this decade, central banks will soon be net buyers, the opportunity cost to owning gold is nil, gold is terribly under-owned, the metal is very cheap relative to the monetary base, and the public is just beginning to wake up to the merits of owning gold.

I find gold as attractive today as I did in 2003, although the investment case has changed somewhat. My contrarian nature struggles somewhat with the tremendous performance gold and gold stocks have already posted and the fact that gold is no longer hated and undiscovered. Nevertheless, the investment case remains strong, and there is a very decent chance that a mania phase still lies ahead. I suspect the time to sell will be when virtually everyone can quote you the price of gold.





link to video


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Monday, November 9, 2009

IEA Whistleblower Buoys Peak Oil Theory

There's a terrific piece in the Guardian today entitled "Key oil figures were distorted by US pressure, says whistleblower." The gist of the story is that the IEA has been intentionally overstating future oil supply estimates in order to prevent a panic. Some key passages:

"The IEA in 2005 was predicting oil supplies could rise as high as 120m barrels a day by 2030 although it was forced to reduce this gradually to 116m and then 105m last year," said the IEA source, who was unwilling to be identified for fear of reprisals inside the industry. "The 120m figure always was nonsense but even today's number is much higher than can be justified and the IEA knows this.

"Many inside the organisation believe that maintaining oil supplies at even 90m to 95m barrels a day would be impossible but there are fears that panic could spread on the financial markets if the figures were brought down further. And the Americans fear the end of oil supremacy because it would threaten their power over access to oil resources," he added.

A second senior IEA source, who has now left but was also unwilling to give his name, said a key rule at the organisation was that it was "imperative not to anger the Americans" but the fact was that there was not as much oil in the world as had been admitted. "We have [already] entered the 'peak oil' zone. I think that the situation is really bad," he added.

This is huge news as many of the Peak Oil doubters had depended on IEA data to bolster their case. It also speaks to the unreliability of official statistics. If non-OPEC data is being so severely manipulated, just imagine how absurd OPEC numbers must be.

The days of inexpensive and easily accessible oil are over. There is still plenty of oil buried very deep offshore West Africa, Brazil, and in the Gulf of Mexico. Other deep plays are sure to be discovered as well, and the Arctic region holds great promise. The tar sands also hold a great quantity of oil. None of these plays, however, are inexpensive. High oil prices will be required to justify the investment needed to explore and develop these reserves.

These high oil prices will also be the incentive the market needs to develop alternative energy sources. The higher the price of oil goes, the more competitive the alternatives become. Still, this shift will take decades. In the meantime, higher oil prices will be a boon to much of the traditional energy sector.

We are long a number of E&P and energy service stocks. There will be bumps along the way, but energy should be a winner in the coming decade.



The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Chart Of The Day: VIX

The VIX index (a measure of implied volatility) put in an amazing performance on Friday, rocketing 24% higher on the session. The index had been trending lower since peaking just north of 80 in late December of last year. On October 21st, it reached its lowest level since September of 2008. Not coincidentally, that was also the day of the stock market's most recent peak. The volatility of volatility was pretty dramatic in October.








Disclosure: Things had become a little too calm for our liking. We initiated a long volatility position on October 19th to increase our hedge position.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Quote Of The Day: Qin Xiao and Chinese Bubbles

This quote comes from a Financial Times story entitled, "Top China banker warns on asset bubbles." What I most appreciate is that I can't imagine a top U.S. banker saying this. From the article:

China needs an “urgent” tightening of monetary policy to prevent the huge stimulus measures introduced this year from inflating stock and property bubbles, one of the country’s leading bankers has warned.

Qin Xiao – chairman of China Merchants Bank, the country’s sixth-biggest – says in Thursday’s Financial Times that the government should not be afraid of a “moderate slowdown” in the economy.

“Monetary policy must not neglect asset-price movements,” he writes. “Therefore it is urgent that China shifts from a loose monetary policy stance to a neutral one.”


Of course, this doesn't mean that the authorities will be immediately changing policy (though they should). However, if they continue their loose monetary policy, their stock and real estate bubbles will get out of hand. The higher they run, the harder they'll fall. It'll be interesting to see how the authorities walk the fine line between encouraging employment growth and asset bubbles and intentionally (and responsibly) slowing economic activity. Regardless, the fact that a private sector leader can so freely, frankly, and intelligently speak his mind is refreshing, even if it's coming from half-way around the world.


Disclosure: We recently sold our China equity exposure.

The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Earnings Season Progress: Perception vs. Reality

The lunatics are back in charge. First we had Meredith Whitney upgrade Goldman Sachs. She was rather cautious on the fundamental prospects of the banking sector, but did anyone care? No.

Next, we learned that Meredith has a pretty good contact at Goldman as they reported a blowout quarter. Of course, they're benefiting from the "unfortunate" demise of a few of their key competitors which has resulted in widening spreads and terrific near-term trading profits. How many other large "banks" will benefit from this? A couple. Commercial and residential loans continue to deteriorate. Does anyone care? Not really.

Intel followed. Nice quarter. Revenue was better than expected which helped boost gross margin. Of course, Intel is at the back end of the supply chain and not the best company to listen to when it comes to tech industry guidance (I'd happily wager that they guide down revenue before their next report). We also just learned that AMD posted a fairly poor quarter, so Intel clearly benefited at the expense of a key competitor. That's a different story than a general tech rebound. Does anyone care? Doesn't look like it.

Apple was next to release. Not surprisingly (they always guide low), the company posted a strong quarter with particular strength coming from iPhones. Despite the recession, this is clearly the hottest consumer gadget on the market. Does this have any bearing on technology consumption in general? Not much. In fact, it could easily be argued that the money that cash-strapped consumers are spending on iPhones and monthly calling plans is money not being spent on other products. Does anyone care? Not much.

Plenty of companies have already reported. In general, we're seeing continued weakness on the top line (revenue) with pretty good cost cutting. With analysts having low-balled estimates (at times without company guidance), we're seeing plenty of headlines heralding a slew of earnings beats. With each beat from a high-profile company, the market charges higher.

The bulls contend that corporate America will be nice and lean when the imminent rebound occurs thanks to aggressive cost cutting. Margins will rebound strongly as will earnings. We've also seen a few of the quieter bulls pop up in the media recently. Bill Miller and Mario Gabelli have just sounded the all-clear. In addition, plenty of analysts have been upgrading stocks to "Buy" on the heels of these "wondrous" earnings. Interestingly, these folks were awfully quiet earlier this year. Now that the market has jumped 35% and many stocks have more than doubled, they're telling us that it's safe to wade back in. Different business cycle, same self-serving lemming behavior.

Yes. A few large well-known companies have reported decent earnings, but these companies are not at all indicative of the earnings prospect of the S&P 500. There are unique and one-time explanations for these results, and the weaker reports of many lesser-known companies confirm this. Even the almighty Google reported nearly flat revenue growth. Where was the concern? The market barely budged.

For those of us with a less sanguine view of our economic prospects in the next few years, the continued weakness in revenue is a serious concern. Costs can only be cut so far before margins are impacted.

We've been steadily reducing our exposure to equities during this rally. We were getting paid well to incur risk back in February and March. That's no longer the case.

Does anyone care? Not at the moment. At some point, they will. Sentiment can drive the market in the near-term, but the fundamentals will eventually reassert themselves. Until then, be wary of the lunatics.



The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Friday, May 8, 2009

April Employment and The Joy of Birth

The headline from Bloomberg states, "U.S. Loses 539,000 Jobs, Fewer Than Forecast, in Sign Economy Stabilizing." After looking through the release, I have just a couple of comments.

First, expectations were for a loss of 600,000 jobs. The better-than-expected result can be attributed to the addition of 72,000 government jobs, with most of those jobs being added at the federal level. This is hardly surprising given the record spending coming out of Washington. It probably took 72,000 people just to spell check the budget. Our ever-expanding federal government is hardly a source of strong future economic growth.

More significantly, the Birth/Death model registered its largest monthly gain of the past 12 months. In the midst of the worst recession since the Great Depression, the government birth/death model has projected that 226,000 jobs were created in April. 76,000 jobs were apparently "born" in the leisure and hospitality sector, despite hotel occupancy rates plummeting. I suppose if we count all of the Craigslist ads for "personal massages" that might make sense. Back all of these assumed jobs out of the total and we're left with a loss of 765,000 jobs in April.

But you won't read about this 765,000 loss because all is right with the world again. The banks are stress-free, consumer confidence is rising, housing is bottoming, we're in a new bull market, and debt and non-performing assets are oh so yesterday.

Disclaimer: The Rubbernecker is once again shorting select U.S. equities.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

One Simple, Bold, Realistic Move

I've been thinking about what I would do to address this crisis if I were President Obama. Abdicate and hit the speaker's circuit for a huge stress-free payday is the obvious choice. I have plenty of suggestions as to what should be done, but I am a realist. My ideas as to what should be done don't have a serious chance of being implemented until we default on our debt, suffer a collapse of our currency, suffer from hyperinflation, and/or lose a war against Switzerland.

Until then, I do have one idea for Obama which could actually be implemented and have an immediate positive impact. I would "ask" Treasury Secretary Geithner to resign for "personal reasons," and I would immediately appoint Paul Volcker as the new Treasury Secretary. Volcker has presently been relegated to the role of heading the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board. That means that it's his job to bring the donuts in the morning.

I don't know of anyone in the financial world right now who has more credibility than Volcker. He's the only U.S. official in the past 20 years who has been able to conclusively prove himself a vertebrate. Volcker was appointed Chairman of the Federal Reserve in 1979 and proceeded to take the politically dangerous path of jacking up interest rates to pull our country out of the stagflation of the 1970s. That's exactly the type of leadership and experience we need right now.

Let's not kid ourselves. We face many real problems which will take some time to unwind no matter what the government does. At the margin, however, credibility and confidence do play a role. So far, the government's mixed messages, flip-flopping, half measures, speeches devoted to future speeches about plan details, and lack of transparency have led to increased uncertainty and volatility. Appointing Volcker along with a firm statement that Volcker had carte blanche to clean up the banks would be a tremendous step forward. I would be buying equities on the day of that announcement.

In the meantime, I plan to await the administration's plan to start planning on a plan to plan for the planning of a speech to lay out their plans for this crisis.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Monday, February 23, 2009

Curse Of The Contrarian

It's so ugly out there, it's hard not to be a little bullish. My contrarian sympathies have certainly been helpful in avoiding complete disasters over the years and have been instrumental in all of my most profitable investments. But everything has a cost. The curse of the contrarian is often being early in your calls, sometimes quite a bit early. That has always struck me as a very fair trade.

With the global economy now in tatters, stock markets hitting fresh multi-year lows, and journalists jockeying to see who can use the word "depression" most often in their articles, the contrarian in me is starting to feel a little frisky. Perhaps the stars are aligning for a nice rally. For today's exercise, we'll temporarily set aside all of the doom and gloom (of which I've contributed my share over the years), and we'll take a look at a few positive developments.

  1. We can argue about the merits of the stimulus (and I've been against it from the start), but there's a good deal of monetary and fiscal stimulus on the way. The authorities have made it clear that they will stop at nothing to "fix" the economy. Ignoring the potential longer-term negative consequences of their prescription, the current and future stimulus (yes, there will be more) will show up in the economy.
  2. Stocks in the U.S. are now off about 48% from their highs. Much bad news has been discounted.
  3. Bearish sentiment has been climbing again. The herd of bulls is thinning and those remaining are far less vocal.
  4. The Leading Economic Indicators rose for 2 straight months. Yes, it can be explained away, but at least it rose.
  5. The money supply has been rising at a healthy clip. True, it isn't making it's way into the economy -- yet. That could change sooner than expected.
  6. On a related note, there is a great deal of cash sitting on the sidelines, waiting for a little more clarity and confidence to move back into risky assets.
  7. On a related note, the fixed income markets have been showing some signs of life recently.
  8. Once again, a number of pundits are questioning Buffett's investment acumen. That's usually a good contrary signal.
  9. New housing starts are plummeting. This will help with the excess housing inventory problem. It will still take more time, but it's happening.
  10. Companies have been fairly quick to reduce costs in this downturn, and corporate balance sheets were in pretty good shape going into it. Once business finally does pick up, we could see some rapid margin expansion.
  11. Based on a number of different metrics, equity valuation looks much more reasonable. We're hardly at bear market lows, but some metrics are at levels not seen in a couple of decades.
  12. The market has fallen 14% since February 9th. It sure feels like we're oversold near-term.
That was refreshing. Again, this is not a bottom call. In the near-term, we are oversold. Markets don't go straight down. It would be more surprising to me if we didn't experience a rally imminently.

In recent days, I've added a little more market exposure, reduced our already small short position, and reduced our gold position (still one of our larger holdings). Gold is due for a healthy pullback after its recent rise, and I suspect a rally in the market may result in a decline in gold as safe haven buying temporarily wanes. Should this occur, I'll be rebuilding the gold position again.

The odds favor any rally being a trading opportunity. In the meantime, I'll enjoy basking in my relative bullishness.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Saturday, February 14, 2009

So, Where Are We Now?

I appreciate all of the inquiries as to my disappearance lately. I'd love to report that I've been relaxing on a beach on a remote telecommunications-free island in the Caribbean, but client business, trading, earnings season, and a beautiful, laughing, 4-month old daughter have kept me very busy these past few weeks. As earnings season slows I hope to have a little more time for the Rubbernecker, sleep, and personal grooming.

I certainly haven't avoided writing due to a lack of material! Let me try and catch up with the past few weeks and recap where we stand.

  • As we know, the Fed has driven interest rates to ridiculous below-market rates.
  • These low rates are devastating for the savings of retirees who have no business moving out on the risk curve in search of higher yield.
  • These low rates are also supposed to encourage more borrowing despite the fact that our economy is currently suffering from too much debt.
  • Congress is angry that the banks aren't lending their bailout funds to people who already have too much debt in the middle of some type of economic "ession."
  • Congress is criticizing bankers for paying themselves too much, over-levering their balance sheets, and maintaining huge off-balance sheet liabilities while Congressfolk continue to pay themselves too much, over-leverage our nation's balance sheet, and maintain huge off-balance sheet liabilities.
  • The collective earnings of the S&P 500 companies will register its first decline ever in the fourth quarter of 2008. Ever.
  • Congress just passed a $787 billion stimulus plan that will further increase our national debt and displace private investment. The notion that this and future stimulus is only temporary and will be withdrawn once the economy recovers is laughable.
  • Over $8 trillion in spending/promises have been incurred in the past year.
  • We have a Treasury Secretary in charge of both the financial industry bailout and the IRS who either isn't smart enough or honest enough to do his own taxes properly.
  • This same Treasury Secretary just announced an eagerly-awaited financial bailout plan that included no details and no plan aside from somehow spending a lot more money.
  • The Obama administration is now working on some scheme to "save" the housing market. Whatever the details of the plan, we can be sure it will entail using the tax dollars of those who were prudent to "rescue" those who made bad choices. It will also impede the housing market finding a bottom.
  • This year's Federal budget deficit is creeping towards $1.5 trillion, and is sure to rise further as tax receipts continue to fall.
Debt, Debt, and More Debt
Simply put, this massive increase in debt is an inter-generational transfer of wealth. In other words, we're doing this for our own current "benefit" and will be passing the bill to our children. Where's the discussion of fairness? With every bailout of the past year, our leaders have told us that we must act immediately or the global economy will collapse. That hasn't left much time for educated discussion, nor has it prevented the global collapse that their swift undebated action was supposed to prevent. Last week, I explained to my 4-month old daughter that her share of the national debt is well over $200,000. You should have seen the diaper I had to change after that.

It amazes me how accepted it has become that the the cure for any slowdown of any magnitude is always to throw money at it. This is the policy that we've pursued consistently since the Great Depression, and look where it's gotten us. There's a popular quote that seems rather appropriate. "If you keep doing what you've been doing you'll keep getting what you've been getting."

For far too long, our policy makers have increased and encouraged borrowing at every whiff of a slowdown rather than let the market correct the excesses that have built up. Each time, they managed to forestall what would have been a healthy correction at the expense of preordaining a more severe future correction. Ironically, now that it's time to pay the piper, our authorities are laying the blame on the failings of the free market instead of their constant meddling. Unfortunately, their actions will only prolong the length of this downturn.

As I've stated before, the good news is that the market is still doing its job, and many of the excesses (excluding government credit and money supply expansion) are gradually being cleared away. The housing bubble is unwinding, consumers are beginning to save again, global equity markets are back to far more reasonable levels, excess production capacity is starting to dry up, etc. This process will take time, especially with the massive level of government meddling, but it is occurring, and it will eventually take us to a healthier level of economic activity -- one not dependent largely on household credit expansion.

Stock Market Rally?
As ugly as the situation is, there is a strong likelihood that the fiscal and monetary stimulus being dumped on the economy will appear to have a positive impact. As counterproductive and inefficient as most of this spending will eventually prove, the stimulus will at least help slow the rate of decline, probably beginning in the second half of the year. In anticipation of this or at the earliest sign of this, we may experience a fairly strong rally in the equity market as investors come to believe that the worst is behind us. The expected "Obama rally" earlier this year was doomed from the start as too many people were expecting it and were looking to sell into it. With pessimism growing again and less talk of an impending rally, the odds of a rally have actually increased.

To the extent that the credit bubble has not been allowed to correct sufficiently, it's hard to imagine that any such rally will be the real deal. As discussed in prior posts, bear rallies can be powerful. The Great Depression saw a 50% rally over a 6 month period right in the middle of the first leg down. Barring a dramatic change in policy, any rally unaccompanied by a significant correction in the credit bubble is likely to prove a dead cat bounce.

The ballooning national debt and Fed balance sheet also need to be watched. I just can't see all of this stimulus being removed without collapsing any recovery we do eventually get. Government doesn't have a terrific track record of enacting temporary stimulus. Not surprisingly, it typically manages to morph into permanent funding. New constituents will be created who will create lobbying groups, and they won't take kindly to any future talk of decreased funding. The Fed will also find it difficult to withdraw the massive monetary stimulus it has injected. Once the printing presses are humming, it's very difficult to turn them off. Although much of the talk these days is of deflation, I see significant inflation as a much more serious threat down the road.

Strategy Update
As a result, current long-term Treasury yields strike me as unsustainably low. I had shorted the long end of the curve in mid-December and sold that position near the end of January. I didn't anticipate this being a short-term position, but we were fortunate to buy the position close to its low, and it experienced a 25% gain in just over one month. Hopefully, I'll get another crack at it. The Fed has discussed buying long-dated Treasuries. Should they follow through, I would expect another decline in long yields at which time I'll take a hard look at loading up again. Longer-term, this is a position I want to own.

Gold has typically been viewed as an inflation hedge, but it's been one of the best performers in this current deflationary phase (as it was during the Great Depression) as investors flock to its safety and low interest rates minimize the opportunity cost of owning gold. We've been overweight precious metals throughout the gold bull market and have continued to add on pullbacks. In early January, I bought a few junior mining names that had been driven to ridiculously attractive prices. More recently, I eased back on our GLD/DGP position in those accounts where the position grew just a little too large following this recent rally. We still own a healthy precious metals position and would be quick to add on any significant pullback.

Most of the balance of our aggressive portfolios hasn't changed significantly. Our bias at these levels is towards select emerging markets and commodities. I take a long-term approach with these positions and am quick to point out that I have no expectation for these positions in the short-term (less than one year). The countries I'm focusing on have already declined significantly, have experienced an outflow of hot money, are marked by high savings rates, have at least reasonably solid reserves, and are trading at attractive valuation levels. Five years from now, I expect to be pleased with their performance.

We still hold a decent cash position, and we continue to have just a few short positions as the recent leg down in the market has made it more difficult to find many compelling short opportunities. As usual, at the margin I would anticipate selling some long positions and increasing short exposure if we get a strong rally without signs of a significant positive change in the underlying fundamentals.

I think that catches me up from my relative absence the past few weeks. I now have to go explain to my daughter why she'll be learning Chinese and why her savings account is short the dollar. I'll be putting a second "backup" diaper on first.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Monday, January 12, 2009

Some Nice Local Press

Over the past couple of weeks, the Cary News, the Raleigh News&Observer, and WRAL each published/aired a story about my involvement in helping the town of Cary with its investment portfolio last year. I wasn’t looking for or expecting any acknowledgment, so the press coverage has been a pleasant surprise.


There are two factual points to clarify. First, although the article refers to my “gut feel”, my concerns came from a detailed analysis of Fannie and Freddie's balance sheet as well as my expectations for a deteriorating housing market. I leave hunches and inklings to more trivial matters like whether to have a baby or which wild berries to eat.


Second, the article and TV clip mention that I sold positions in Fannie and Freddie for myself and my clients. The fact is that I never owned these stocks. I actually shorted (bet that the share price would fall) Freddie Mac (FRE) shares back in March for myself and clients. The concept of shorting can be a little difficult to grasp, and I suspect the reporters were busy enough trying to figure out if there was any possible lighting scheme that would make me look remotely presentable.


The TV news segment was filmed with virtually no notice, so I'm grateful to the WRAL team for their generous and thoughtful editing. I have a new respect and understanding for just how quickly and efficiently a news crew is able to pull a story together and get it on the air. Of course, I'm also grateful to the town's finance department for taking my concerns seriously.


TV segment: http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/4235053/


Newspaper article: http://www.newsobserver.com/news/wake/cary/story/1345473.html





The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Monday, December 22, 2008

Government Revenue Creep

I concluded my November 25th post ("Who Doesn't Enjoy A Good Spending Spree?") with the following comment: "This has been the enduring failure of Keynesian economics. Everyone loves a good spending spree. No one ever wants to take away the punch bowl."

The following graph (courtesy of Greg Mankiw) does a wonderful job of illustrating this. The rapid increase in government revenue relative to GDP in the early 1940's was due to World War II. The more interesting observation, though, is that this temporary increase in the size and scope of government was never reined in following the war. Instead, the government's share of economic activity has continued to grow over the past 60 years.



It would be naive to think that our government will ever proactively address the growing deficit and debt (on and off balance sheet) problem that we face. As has typically been the case, our leaders won't act until forced to, at which time we may be faced with a serious decline in the value of the dollar and/or the arrival of hyperinflation. Some combination of less government expenditure, higher taxes, lower entitlement spending, higher inflation, reduced entitlement benefits, and a weaker dollar are what ultimately await us. What we don't know are the exact contents of this poisonous cocktail or the timing of its arrival.

As for the investment ramifications of this, I would expect dollar weakness and gold strength. Assuming reasonable global growth, I would expect many commodities to perform well, and select international equity markets with better growth prospects and better fiscal restraint should handily outperform the U.S. (assuming reasonable valuation). Much of the U.S. fixed income market would be destroyed, although TIPS would certainly benefit.

Not coincidentally, many of our core long-term positions would benefit from such a scenario. Also consistent with this thesis, I recently added a long Canadian dollar and short U.S. Treasury (20+years) position. I'll spend a little more time on each of these later this week.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Monday, December 15, 2008

Seymour: 1927-1933 Pompous Prognosticators

1927-1933 Chart of Pompous Prognosticators


It's easy to cherry pick quotes to suit your purpose, but this is still a good reminder of the difficulty in predicting where the market is going. The entire piece by Colin Seymour as well as the associated 20 quotes can be found here.



The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Bear Rally Chatter and Strategy Update









This market continues to favor traders and thrill seekers. I've talked about fading this market a number of times in the past few months, and, at the margin, that's what I've been doing. The basic rule has been simple: when my wife has had to talk me off the railing of our one-story deck, its time to buy, and when I start doing Schwarzenegger impressions, it's time to short. Recently, I've been doing Schwarzenegger impressions on the deck railing.

In mid-late November, I added positions in UWM and QLD as the market was again rolling over and the VIX (fear) index was once more spiking towards record levels. Since that time the number of market professionals looking for a bear market rally seems to have grown by the day. I've read quite a few of them just this week talking about a rally into early next year, even those who are very bearish. I'm a bit surprised by the timing of these calls considering that the market has already rallied 20% from its intraday low on November 21st. There's nothing like a good rally to bring out a bunch of predictions for...a rally. The lemmings that went over the cliff are climbing back up for the next jump.

Bear market rallies much greater than 20% aren't exactly common. That certainly doesn't mean that the current rebound can't go significantly higher. Recall, we had a 50% rally during the Great Depression, so there is precedent for very powerful upward moves during bear markets, but these types of moves are very unusual.

In fact, some of the strongest short-term market rallies tend to come during bear markets. It's easy to understand why: fear and greed. On the one hand, the market tends to get oversold in the short-term as fear of a job loss, insolvency, plague, and children who may never leave home grips the masses, and wholesale selling ensues. At the same time, investors who've lost a lot of money are eager to jump on any potential rally that may help them recoup some of their losses in order to help their child with the security deposit on their first apartment. And you never know, the next rally could be the beginning of the next bull market. Who wants to be the idiot who sold at the bottom and kept waiting forever for another chance to buy at those levels?

Back to the present. With a 20% rally already in hand, I have to believe that the easy money from this leg up has been made. That doesn't mean that the market can't go higher, but I'm back at what I call "an inflection point moment." I can't bring myself to add more general market exposure given the move we've already had (though I'm always scouting for individual company opportunities), yet the move up isn't so overdone that there's a clear signal to sell. Unfortunately, I'm just not smart/foolish/prescient/daffy enough to try and call market tops or bottoms, particularly those of a short-term nature. As a result, in this type of environment I tend to build marginal market long and short exposure as the strength or weakness of the market accelerates.

In keeping with that, I haven't yet sold the QLD or UWM positions, but they will be jettisoned should the market rally much further. In the meantime, I'm willing to give them a little more time as the market has finally been responding well to bad news. I have, however, recently added some modest new short exposure in the real estate area. This is partly due to the fact that this sector has had one of the smartest rebounds during this latest market rally. With the market up 20% from its lows, many real estate ETFs are up closer to 50%. This is a logical pool for bottom fishing given the degree of damage we've already seen, but I'm of the opinion that this sector will see further downside, particularly commercial real estate. The current short position is modest, and my intent is to increase the short side of the portfolio (and reduce longs) should the market rally continue.

This particular rally has been gratifying in that many of our core positions in the commodity, mining, industrial, and precious metal sectors have had nice moves. The recent decline in the U.S. dollar from ridiculous levels hasn't hurt. Many of the names/positions in these sectors are trading at very attractive valuation levels for those willing to look beyond the next few days. I've been gradually adding to this space during the downturn and expect to be very pleased with their performance over the next 5-10 years. In the near term, however, they won't be immune to the next sell-off in the market (at which time I'll be adding to them).

Disclosure: The Rubbernecker is long, short, and inflecting.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Intel Lowering Guidance - A Good Thing

What a difference a month makes. One month after releasing its third quarter earnings report, Intel has issued a press release guiding down revenue and margins for the fourth quarter. As recently as October 14th, the company was expecting Q4 revenue to come in between $10.1 and $10.9 billion with gross margin at or near 59%. The company is now looking for revenue of $9 billion with gross margin in the vicinity of 55%. In just under one month, Intel's business has deteriorated by 14%. This is a huge miss.

There will be plenty of negative commentary over the next day about this miss, but I actually think this may perversely turn out to be positive for the market in the near-term. Despite the earnings misses and the cautious guidance from virtually every company this earnings season, Q4 and 2009 earnings expectations still remain too high. Now that bellwethers Intel and Cisco have both put a serious ding in expectations, it's hard to imagine that investors and analysts will be able to ignore the poor near-term earnings reality that nearly all companies face.

I suspect this will soon lead to yet another near-term bottom (though not necessarily THE bottom) in the market, as investors (particularly the pros) start to think that a more realistically poor earnings outlook is finally being discounted.

As I wrote in my
November 6th post:

As we stand now, I plan to continue fading strong moves in the market. I'll be looking to cover the current shorts and rebuild the long side should we head back to recent lows. If we turn around and start heading back up, I anticipate adding short exposure in the S&P 500 and the Russell 2000 as well as in the consumer, alternative energy, and financial spaces.
With the market now down about 15% from its most recent peak on November 4th, my bias has again shifted to the long side. Today I covered 2 of my outstanding (alternative energy) shorts, leaving one financial short. I've also begun to add some long exposure (Russell 2000 and QQQQ). I plan to keep building the long portion of the portfolio at lower levels and will be a bit more aggressive if we see a sharp Intel-inspired sell-off tomorrow morning.

Disclosure: The Rubbernecker is getting longer again but is still short slothful, Panglossian, sell-side analysts.

The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Friday, November 7, 2008

Cramer Still Confused

A friend brought an article to my attention today written by Jim Cramer entitled, "Cramer: Four Reasons to be Skittish." Cramer starts off the article as follows:

People ask me why I am so often freaked out about what is happening daily in this market. Let me give you four reasons: Sheldon Adelson, Sumner Redstone, Howard Lester and Aubrey McClendon.

All four of these gentlemen got overextended and bought too much of their own stock or the stock of another company and got margined out.
These four gentlemen are the heads of Las Vegas Sands (LVS), CBS (CBS), Williams-Sonoma (WSM), and Chesapeake Energy (CHK), respectivley. These stocks have all been destroyed in recent months, and their chiefs have been forced to sell their stock near the lows to meet margin calls.

Cramer's punchline is simple. "Four men. Four seasoned players. Four guys who didn't see it coming. So how are we supposed to?"

I take a somewhat different view of this. We have some very smart and successful guys who've been forced to sell their shares in the companies they run because they believed so strongly in their companies that they borrowed huge amounts of money to "back the truck up." As a contrarian, this type of news strikes me as fairly constructive. Smart guys don't get forced out of their shares at market tops.

Maybe Jim is really "freaked out" because the value of his 3.9 million shares of TheStreet.com has fallen from $62 million earlier this year to $13.7 million today. And maybe he's freaked out that a prolonged bear market might not be good for his shock-jock style of investment "advice."

Either way, the fact that Cramer has turned more negative on the market long-term is probably another piece of bullish data.

Disclosure: The Rubbernecker is still short a "freaked out" Cramer.

The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Obama Rally and Market Strategy

Buy on the rumor, and sell on the news. The markets had a nice run-up of nearly 20% in the week prior to the election. This can't all be attributed to an expected Obama victory, but it was likely one of the factors.

Now, it's the morning after (well, the afternoon of the morning after the morning after), and it seems both Democrats and Republicans are selling shares once again. I'm guessing that Obama's supporters are selling some shares to replenish their cash after funding his campaign to the tune of $600 million (an absolutely insane figure). Republicans are likely terrified of the Democratic victory and are selling some shares to stock up on ammo and to reserve their "Palin 2012" commemorative moosehide parkas.

To what degree did an expected Obama win help boost stock prices just prior to the election? Of course, we can't quantify it precisely, but it may be instructive to look at the following graph of TAN, a solar ETF. This basket of solar stocks rallied about 75% in the week leading up to election day.


Obama has made no secret of his support for alternative energy development. In an October 31st
interview with Wolf Blitzer of CNN, Obama listed energy independence as his number 2 priority for 2009 (the economy was number one). In that interview, Obama said, "We have to seize this moment, because it's not just an energy independence issue; it's also a national security issue, and it's a jobs issue. We can create 5 million new green energy jobs." The strong move in the alternative energy stocks leading up to the election hints of an expected Obama victory being one of the factors for the rally.

So, again we've had a rally, and again we're giving it back. There are plenty of potential explanations. Could be acceptance that analyst earnings estimates still have to come down. Perhaps the reality that our economic and financial problems transcend any President or government action is setting in. Maybe we're seeing profit-taking from the rally or more forced de-leveraging. Perhaps the Plunge Protection Team had to take a breather to reload the ink in its printing press.

Whatever the case, we should expect the dramatic volatility in the market over the past month to continue in the near-term. Fortunately, this volatility has provided some good trading opportunities. As I've stated, my intention has been to fade any strong moves in this market, and that's what I've been doing. Both times last month that the S&P 500 approached 850, I turned short-term bullish and added some long market exposure while covering my shorts. And both times the S&P 500 approached 1000, I sold those positions. The most recent assault on 1000 occurred on election day, during which I fortuitously unloaded the QLD, SSO, and GOOG exposure that had been added during the prior dip.

I was hoping to rebuild my short exposure gradually during the latest market rally. Unfortunately, I was only able to add a few short positions (a couple of alternative energy names and one financial) before the rally fizzled.

As we stand now, I plan to continue fading strong moves in the market. I'll be looking to cover the current shorts and rebuild the long side should we head back to recent lows. If we turn around and start heading back up, I anticipate adding short exposure in the S&P 500 and the Russell 2000 as well as in the consumer, alternative energy, and financial spaces.


I'm also keeping an eye on the currencies. I sold our Yen exposure back on the 24th when it spiked, leaving us with exposure to only the Chinese Renminbi. I should have rolled the Yen exposure into the Canadian dollar at the time, but I missed it. The long-term fundamentals of the U.S. do not support its recent strength. The strong move in the dollar has been largely due to short-term technical reasons as well as a knee-jerk flight-to-safety. I am very negative on the dollar (long-term) at these levels and will likely be buying the Canadian dollar if it weakens much further.

Disclosure: The Rubbernecker is long volatility and short whiplash.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Chesapeake - Never Boring

At the beginning of 2008, Chesapeake had a market value of $23 billion. Four months ago this company had a market value of $43 billion. A few weeks ago, that market value had fallen to $7 billion, and today it stands at $12.7 billion. I'm getting a bout of vertigo just typing these numbers.


I know what you're thinking. "What's the big deal? All of the banks are getting killed these days." That's fine, but this isn't a bank. This is the largest independent producer of natural gas in the United States. They have a strong exploration and production track record and hold some large and interesting acreage positions.

$43 billion to $7 billion in a few months. That's a decline of over 80%. That works out to over a 300% annualized loss (it's the new math). Immediately, one's thoughts wander to Enron. These guys must have been cooking the books. They must have overstated the amount of natural gas reserves they own, right? Wrong. So what's going on here?

For starters, we have to put that 80% decline in context. The market overall hasn't been exactly kind to anyone since the end of July. From the time of CHK's peak to its bottom earlier last month, the S&P 500 fell about 30%. It didn't help that natural gas prices fell 53% over this same time period in sympathy with oil prices (down 43%) as the global economy continued to sputter. XOP, the SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF, was down 62% over this period. Still, CHK has outdone itself by falling further than any of these.

There is an added wrinkle to the CHK story. Chesapeake's CEO, Aubrey McClendon, owned about 32 million shares of CHK on October 8th. A couple of days later, most of those shares were gone. Loss of confidence in the company? Not exactly. McClendon was hit with a margin call. Amazingly, this billionaire thought it wise to keep adding to his already sizable CHK stake by buying on margin as the stock started falling this summer. You have to admire his belief in the company while questioning his money management strategy.

It boggles the mind that a billionaire would risk his fortune by buying stock on margin and not diversifying his holdings, but that's what McClendon did. This is a massive failure in Financial Planning 101. Amazingly, he wasn't alone. We've been learning of executives at other firms (see BSX, CPE, DNR, LTM, PROV, PHM, and WSM) also experiencing margin calls, although of a lesser magnitude.

McClendon was forced to unload 31.5 million shares between October 8th and 10th at an average price of just over $18/share. He sold 1.8 million of those shares as low as $12.64 on the 10th. Ouch. With the stock now back at $22, that forced sale has "cost" McClendon another $125 million. Ouch. It doesn't help that this margin call occurred as the market was gapping down to a new low on the 10th.

You can see in the chart below that from the peak on the 9th to the low on the 10th, CHK lost about 50% of its value. With about half of McClendon's shares hitting the market on the 10th, it's pretty safe to assume that the extra 15 million share of selling pressure somewhat exacerbated the stock's decline. Not surprisingly, with that selling pressure now abated and with the market a bit higher, CHK has rebounded a tremendous 83% from its intra-day low on the 10th.


This is all water under the bridge at this point. The more pertinent issue is what to do with the stock now. Is the stock attractive at this level, or is this a value trap? As I've shared in the past, if I can't figure out that a company is inexpensive on the back of an envelope then it isn't worth my time or money. And, as always, I encourage everyone to do their own work.


With that said I'd like to share a couple of comments from last Friday's quarterly earnings conference call (10/31/08) that caught my attention. Chesapeake CEO, Aubrey McClendon, started off the call with an interesting statement:

First, we open the third quarter with a bang, in announcing a very innovative sale of 20% of Chesapeake's Haynesville acreage position in the Plains for $3.3 billion in cash and drilling carry. This was a great transaction for both parties and established a $13 billion value for our remaining 80% in the Haynesville, a value that today ironically exceeds our entire market cap. That does seem very unusual to me.
What makes this even more intriguing is that the Haynesville play accounts for only 20% of the company's total proved and risked unproved reserves. We can argue all day and night about the pros and cons of shale gas production, but this is an actual deal with a knowledgable buyer, so it's hard to dismiss it. To be fair, however, this deal was struck back when natural gas prices were near their peak, so I don't believe for a minute that the company would fetch $13 billion for its remaining 80% today. In defense of management, however, their timing on that sale was impeccable, or impeccably lucky.

McClendon continued,
Second, in early August, we completed another innovative JV transaction, this time in the Fayetteville Shale with British Petroleum to whom we sold 25% of our Fayetteville assets for $1.9 billion, leaving our remaining 75% position in the Fayetteville worth about $6 billion or roughly $10 per share which is about one half of our stock price today. For the record, only about 4% of our proved reserves are booked to the Fayetteville yet this transaction alone established a remaining Fayetteville value equal to 50% of our stock price; again, very unusual.
Again, natural gas prices have fallen since that time. Still, these transactions provide a bit of support and some margin of safety. The company has more of these deals in the works. It will be interesting to see what type of value they receive and its implications for the entire company's valuation.

As I always stress, I don't pretend to know what any stock or market will do in the short-term, but this is the type of situation I like. We have a real company with real assets that is currently out of favor due to a recession of questionable length and severity. If you believe that the recent flood of bad economic and financial news around the world is a sign that the rapture is near, then you'll probably want to pass on this stock (and every stock). Of course, if you believe the rapture is near, why are you wasting your time reading this? If you believe that the economy will eventually recover and you have a long-term horizon, then the following points are worth considering:
  • As with many stocks, this sector is best bought when it's out of favor. Check.
  • Current natural gas prices aren't too far from average industry all-in cost levels. This may provide some price support.
  • Natural gas wells deplete fairly quickly, on average. This helps to balance supply when activity slows due to excess demand.
  • Most everyone is expecting the rig count to continue falling in the coming months, further reducing expected natural gas supply.
  • Natural gas is much cleaner than oil and much closer to home. Demand is likely to resume growing following this recession.
  • CHK's balance sheet looks fine. They have no large near-term debt maturities, they have a nice chunk of cash, and they should generate significant excess cash in coming years.
  • Valuation looks very attractive on a number of metrics.
  • McClendon has to be angry given how much money he recently lost. He probably has a nice-sized chip on his shoulder right now. I wouldn't bet against him.
Importantly, natural gas is a self-correcting market. Lower prices result in less drilling which leads to less supply which leads to higher prices. The only real question relates to the length of time it takes for this to occur, and that depends on how far and fast natural gas prices decline, how quickly firms pull back on their drilling, how quickly wells deplete or are shut-in, and how severe the fall off in demand is. But make no mistake, the stage is again being set for a period of tight supply, higher natural gas prices, and higher equity valuations for this sector.

Disclosure: The Rubbernecker is long CHK and short the rapture.

The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Monday, October 20, 2008

Buffett versus Cramer

Two of the most widely-followed investment personalities were out with some fairly interesting articles late last week. The title probably gave away that I'm talking about Warren Buffett (the richest man in the world) and Jim Cramer (the whiniest man in the world). Buffett came out with a bullish long-term call on U.S. equities, and Cramer came out with an article that sounded a bit defensive and critical of Buffett's piece.

Before delving into the two articles, let's step back and consider which of these two professional investors is more worthy of our attention. I've applied my many years of objective security analysis to this question. The following is a summary of my conclusions:

  • Cramer has a goatee. I don't trust goatees. Lenin had a goatee. Alleged steroid user Mark McGuire had a goatee. Stoners Danny Bonaduce and Shaggy (of Scooby Doo fame) have goatees. Pee Wee Herman has a goatee. Colonel Sanders has a goatee (I'm a vegetarian). Count Von Count of Sesame Street has a goatee (pure evil).
  • One of them is intelligent, witty, and relevant. The other one is Jim Cramer.
  • Warren Buffett is the Warren Buffett of his time. Jim Cramer is the Jerry Springer of his.
  • If I were stranded on a desert island and had to take Buffett or Cramer with me, I'd pick Cramer. He'd be more likely to help me get over my aversion to cannibalism.
So, it's a tight race, but in the end I'm going to have to go with Buffett.

Buffett wrote an op-ed piece for the New York Times on October 16th that laid out the case for buying equities. In it, Buffett wrote the following:
THE financial world is a mess, both in the United States and abroad. Its problems, moreover, have been leaking into the general economy, and the leaks are now turning into a gusher. In the near term, unemployment will rise, business activity will falter and headlines will continue to be scary.

So ... I’ve been buying American stocks. This is my personal account I’m talking about, in which I previously owned nothing but United States government bonds. (This description leaves aside my Berkshire Hathaway holdings, which are all committed to philanthropy.) If prices keep looking attractive, my non-Berkshire net worth will soon be 100 percent in United States equities.

Why?

A simple rule dictates my buying: Be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful. And most certainly, fear is now widespread, gripping even seasoned investors.

...Let me be clear on one point: I can’t predict the short-term movements of the stock market. I haven’t the faintest idea as to whether stocks will be higher or lower a month — or a year — from now. What is likely, however, is that the market will move higher, perhaps substantially so, well before either sentiment or the economy turns up. So if you wait for the robins, spring will be over.

...Today people who hold cash equivalents feel comfortable. They shouldn’t. They have opted for a terrible long-term asset, one that pays virtually nothing and is certain to depreciate in value. Indeed, the policies that government will follow in its efforts to alleviate the current crisis will probably prove inflationary and therefore accelerate declines in the real value of cash accounts.
So, we have Buffett saying that stocks look attractive for the long-term, and he's moving his money from Treasuries to equities at these levels. Importantly, he's emphasizing that he has no idea where stocks are headed in the short-term. Notice that he considers even one year to be a short time period, as do I. I have a hard time arguing with him since I turned positive (for the first time in years) on the market back on October 10th as the market was dipping below 8300. I'm sure Buffett is comforted by that.

In response to Buffett's op-ed, Cramer put out a piece entitled "Sure, Buffett Can Afford To Buy Here." Here are a few snippets from that article:

Great to see Warren Buffett buying here. Fabulous. He has a lot of firepower. He is right to buy American. And I want to go with him, except, he's been buying for awhile, and, more important, he can be down 20% to 30% and it doesn't matter.

Buffett emphasizes over and over again that he can't time the market. Over and over again, he makes the point that he is in it for the long term.

...So, let's do the math. Let's say he is as wrong in these new buys as he was in his General Electric buy a few weeks ago. If you use, for the sake of argument, the allegedly controversial call I made when the Dow was at 10,000 that you need to take as much money out of the market as you may need for a big purchase in the next five years, you will need to gain 37% in your stocks to get back to even. Thirty-seven percent.

Do you think that you will be able to make that back? Maybe if you are the house, like Buffett, maybe if you have a long-term time frame.

But that was never my point. My point was that, if you need that money in the short term, it is better not to have it in the market.

...These buys are of absolutely no consequence to him whatsoever. He may very well make fortunes on his buys. And he has waited until stocks are down.

But are you Warren Buffett? Are you as rich as he is that you don't need to worry about those big purchases? If you are, I say bombs away. Go with him.

If you are not, consider that, if you followed him with GE and then followed him today with this New York Times picks and those prices fell as much as GE did, you would be in a real jam.

So, Jim is basically saying a few things. First of all, don't buy stocks if they're going to fall. Ok...right. That's too ridiculous to even comment on.

Second, apparently Buffett is clearly an idiot for investing in GE too early. I'm a little confused by this. Buffett invested $3 billion in GE PREFERRED stock that will earn him 10% a year in this low-return, high-risk environment. GE can buy the preferred back from him after 3 years, but at a 10% premium. Buffett is also getting warrants to buy GE common stock at $22.25 at any time during the next 5 years. GE's stock is currently at $19.63, not terribly out-of-the-money. There is a very good chance that GE stock will be above $22.25 in the next 5 years. Even if it isn't, barring the unthinkable, Buffett is guaranteed at least a low-risk 10% return on this investment, yet Cramer is criticizing his timing on the GE investment? Amazing. You don't get those kind of terms from GE when everything is wonderful and their stock is rising, Jim.

Cramer states that if "you followed him [Buffett] with GE and then followed him today with this New York Times picks and those prices fell as much as GE did, you would be in a real jam." That is an apples to oranges comparison. Cramer is assuming you bought GE common when Buffett announced that he had bought GE preferred. Cramer should know better. These are two very different investments, and Joe Mainstreet never had the chance to invest in Buffett's GE preferred. You never were able to "follow" Buffett on this one. Had Buffett bought the common, then Cramer would have a more valid point. I discussed this issue more fully in my article, "My Take On Buffett's Take Of GE Stake".

Third, Cramer tells us not to put money in the stock market that we may need in the next 5 years. Buffett clearly isn't telling you to do otherwise. In fact, he repeatedly emphasizes that this is a long-term call, and with Buffett long-term probably means his next two reincarnations. Besides, am I the only one shocked that Cramer EVER thought it was a great idea to put money you really needed in the next 5 years into equities?!

Fourth, Cramer seems to be saying that we should discount Buffett's opinion because Buffett is wealthy and can therefore afford to be wrong. But doesn't Cramer often remind us how filthy stinking rich he himself is? So, if we shouldn't listen to Buffett because he's rich, doesn't it follow that we shouldn't listen to Cramer either since he's also rich? Or maybe he's saying we should pay more attention to the filthy rich rather than the fabulously rich. To follow that logic through, my stock market opinions are far more valuable than either of theirs, and the homeless guy who lives in the woods behind my gym must be an investment genius.

In all seriousness, I don't know one professional investor who pays any attention to Cramer. I know many who listen when Buffett speaks. If I'm interested in an intelligent and clear-headed investment opinion, I'll listen to Buffett. When I want to feel better about myself, I'll listen to Cramer.

Disclosure: The Rubbernecker is long Midwestern oracles and short self-promoters (unless they're writing a blog).


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Monday, October 13, 2008

Nearly A 1000-Point Rally. Whaddya Know!?

When I wrote in last Friday's post that "Just a decrease in the amount or severity of the bad news (second derivative) could propel a near-term 1000-point Dow rally (not necessarily all in one day)," I have to admit that I wasn't expecting it would all come the very next trading day. Although I like to think that my expertise lies in long-term investing, my shorter-term calls of late haven't been too shabby. Our SSO and QLD positions are up 36% on average after 1 1/2 trading days. Since patting oneself on the back in this business is a sure kiss of death, I'll leave the self-congratulations at that and move on. Luck, intelligence or intelligent luck, we'll take it.

As I also wrote in the Friday post, "If we do get the rally, I won't be shy about closing out these positions as this is not some grand market bottom call. In fact, the more powerful the rally, the more likely I'll be to rebuild the short side of the portfolio." With today's 11.5% rally in the S&P 500, let's just say that I'm now 100 S&P points less bullish than I was just yesterday. The earnings outlook hasn't changed in my view since last night, so valuation, which was finally getting interesting, is now 11.5% less compelling than last night.

With that in mind, I'm certainly impressed that the market rallied strongly into the close and closed right near its high. Inve
stors have regained their confidence (at least for the moment) that the entire global monetary system isn't about to implode. Just as they rushed out of the market in fear as it was collapsing, they are now rushing back in -- this time in fear of missing the rebound.

Whether we've seen the lows of this cycle remains to be seen. Let's not forget that just as bull markets are marked by retrenchments, bear markets are marked by the occasional rally. These rallies are called "sucker rallies" for a reason, and they can be powerful. Following the October crash of 1929, the stock market experienced a nearly 50% rally over a 5 month period before continuing its crushing descent.

Will this rally be short-lived, or will it continue into year-end? There's no way of knowing, but I have no intention of overstaying my welcome. I suspect this move may well have more legs to it, but I also suspect that our recent QQQ and S&P positions will have a fairly short shelf-life in our portfolios. At a minimum, we'll begin scaling out of them very soon should the markets move higher still. Should the rally continue significantly higher, I fully anticipate once again ratcheting up some short positions.

One area that I'm very upbeat on that was left behind by today's rally is gold-related equities. The global flight-out-of-safety that we saw today left gold with a nearly $18 loss on the day. Governments around the globe are publicly announcing that they will print whatever amount of money is necessary to prevent the global financial system from imploding, yet gold is nearly 17% off its high, and gold mining stocks (particularly the junior miners) have been a complete disaster of late.


Events in recent weeks have served to remind the world of gold's value. Mints around the world are unable to keep up with demand for gold coins, and central banks are likely to cherish what gold they have left. On the supply side, exploration is becoming tougher and more expensive, and production is far from robust.

Gold prices and stocks are sure to be volatile, but both look very attractive at the moment, and I'll very likely be putting recent gains and some cash to work in this area imminently. My preference is to have exposure directly to the price of gold as well as to gold mining stocks, but new money will most likely be going into the mining equities given their recent drubbing. I believe that many of these stocks (particularly the juniors) will be triple-digit percentage winners from these levels.

Disclosure: The Rubbernecker is long gift horses and short all of the bottom-calling pundits.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Friday, October 10, 2008

Buckle Up: Turning More Bullish Near-Term

It sure feels like we're due for either a circuit-breaker triggering meltdown in the market or an incredibly powerful bear market rally. How's that for input? The market may go down a lot or up a lot.

My sense is that we'll see the latter, and in keeping with that, virtually all remaining short positions were covered at the close of the market yesterday. Furthermore, with the Dow down another 400 points today, I added two new market long positions to the portfolio, a double long S&P 500 ETF (SSO) and a double long QQQ ETF (QLD). I anticipate building these long positions on further sell-offs near-term if I prove to be a little early on this call.

This move is significant to me because many years have passed since I've made any type of overall bullish call on the U.S. stock market. Although this isn't a market bottom call per se, it feels good to finally be getting more constructive on the U.S. market, even if my bullishness is likely to be short-lived.

Of course, these types of shorter-term calls can be challenging and humbling. I imagine a number of people made a similar bet last Friday with the Dow at 10,325. They would have lost 18% in only five trading days.

Why the change and why now? For one, the market has just fallen nearly 20% in a mere week. To the best of my knowledge this ranks as the second worst week ever for the U.S. stock market. Keep in mind that a 20% decline is often the threshold for bear markets, and we've fallen almost that far in just the last five trading days. I've been looking for some sign of capitulation, and the second worst week in history seems like a pretty good candidate.

In addition, sentiment is simply atrocious. The VIX index spiked from 45 to 70 this past week (30 has often been viewed as an oversold level), and the VXN index has also experienced a huge spike in the last couple of weeks. Both of these indices are measures of volatility, both are illustrating the pervasive sense of fear in the market, and both have proven effective contrary indicators in the past. (Of course, if you went long when the VIX first crossed 30 this time, you'd be sitting on a sizable short-term loss.) These two indices could always climb higher, but with both at or near record levels (since they've been tracked), I believe fear and capitulation are likely to be close to a near-term peak.


Also, anecdotally, it seems as though everything I'm reading is focused on the potential for another Great Depression and a complete financial system meltdown. It's all over the newspapers, the television, the internet, and the Presidential debates. Few experts/pundits are pounding the table to buy stocks right now. Being bearish is popular. The focus seems to be more on how much further this market may fall rather than whether we're due for a bounce. This strikes me as yet another good contrary signal.

What gives me further comfort with this call is that market valuation is now far more reasonable. I've remarked to clients and peers on a number of occasions in the past few months how surprised I was that the market was holding up as well as it was given the fundamentals and the deteriorating earnings outlook. This recent rapid sell-off has helped to catch valuation up with the fundamentals. Although the market typically overshoots averages during manias and undershoots during bear markets, we're now at a very reasonable normalized market P/E multiple (in the low to mid-teens range depending on the earnings measure and time frame used).

This near-term bullish call is predicated on the assumption that the global financial market, though very strained, is not going to completely implode. If that holds true, there could be any number of catalysts to ignite a rally. The beauty, however, is that we don't even necessarily need good news to get a powerful rally given how negative sentiment is. Just a decrease in the amount or severity of the bad news (second derivative) could propel a near-term 1000-point Dow rally (not necessarily all in one day).

The strategy, therefore, is to build this position further if I'm early, barring any significant further deterioration in the fundamentals. If we do get the rally, I won't be shy about closing out these positions as this is not some grand market bottom call. In fact, the more powerful the rally, the more likely I'll be to rebuild the short side of the portfolio.

Oftentimes, investors should be doing that which is least comfortable. The least comfortable action right now is putting money into the market. Hence, that's exactly what we're doing. Buckle up.Disclosure:
The Rubbernecker is long the overall market finally and short on sentiment.

The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.