Showing posts with label Economy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Economy. Show all posts

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Today Only! New-Car Sales Report Out! Hurry! Don't Miss It!

I wrote a brief piece a few days ago about the cash-for-clunkers program and how it would simply pull sales forward rather than stimulating any sustained demand. The first piece of evidence came out today with the release of new-car sales.

From the New York Times:

After two frenzied months during the government’s cash-for-clunkers program, new-vehicle sales in the United States fell in September back to the levels seen earlier this year, automakers said Thursday.

General Motors said it sales declined 45 percent, and Chrysler reported a 42 percent drop from September a year ago.

Sales were down 20 percent at Honda, 13 percent at Toyota and 7 percent at Nissan.

Total industry sales are expected to be 23 percent less than a year ago, according to a forecast by the Web site Edmunds.com.
Those are big declines, but they shouldn't have surprised anyone. Free money is a powerful incentive, even if you had to go further into debt for that new car.
The clunkers program also cleared out inventories at many dealerships, leading G.M., Ford, and other automakers to increase production at some plants and call back thousands of laid-off workers to their assembly lines. Without a large selection for customers to choose from, many dealerships had more difficulty making sales in September than they would have otherwise.
Right. Sales were weak because there just wasn't enough inventory on hand. Ok. Sure. They can float that excuse for a month or two as they're busy ramping production to replenish inventory to meet this supposed burgeoning unmet demand. However, I suspect they'll soon be sitting on too much inventory, offering the latest excuse for weak car sales while aggressively lobbying Congress for Revenge of Cash-for-Clunkers. Here are a few potential excuses for next month's new-car sales report:
  • Customers are eager to buy but are just dazed and confused by our huge inventory selection.
  • Consumers were too busy cashing out their 401Ks to buy food, but they'll be back soon.
  • With more people losing their homes we expect car sales to rocket any day now as folks are forced to live out of their cars.
  • We just didn't have the right mix of inventory to meet the huge demand.
  • We think we just didn't have enough balloons in the showroom to spur sales.
  • It would have been a great month if our commission-based salesmen could have made more money selling cars than collecting unemployment insurance. But just wait til their insurance runs out!
  • Coming soon! Zero down, $10,000 cash back, 1 year no-risk trial period, we'll babysit your kids every other weekend!
  • Americans were too distracted trying to find American Samoa on a map.
We are very unlikely to see a sustained and strong improvement in new car sales, absent continuous government incentive welfare programs. Consumer debt is too high, unemployment is too high and rising, and job loss fears remain elevated. More and more people are discovering that you really don't need a new car every few years.

If only the car manufacturers had stuck to their earlier strategy of manufacturing a bad product that didn't last very long...



The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Monday, September 28, 2009

Quote Of The Day: German Car Industry

Every frat boy (U.S. government) loves a kegger (cash for clunkers), but the resulting hangover (fewer future sales) is another story. Cash for clunkers has come and gone. As expected, auto sales jumped. I personally finally benefited from the government's recent generosity (your tax dollars) and traded in my dear old '96 Ford F-150 for more of a family car. Would I have bought a new car without the incentive? Yes.

All of these government incentive programs are simply shifting sales/demand forward and arbitrarily rewarding some consumers at the expense of others, often for decisions they would have made anyways. They are clearly boondoggles and a waste of taxpayer money, and we're likely to see more of them since "free" money is a difficult drug to kick. We're not even close to a real recovery given that we haven't even completed Step 1 - admitting we have a problem.

The following comes from the latest piece by Evans-Pritchard:
The risk for Germany is that the economy tips into a double-dip recession as emergency stimulus subsides. Its cash-for-clunkers scheme expired earlier this month after a rush of sales over the summer. The Centre for Automotive Research says sales will fall by a million next year in "the largest downturn ever suffered by the German car industry".



The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Chart Of The Day: Baltic Dry Index Revisited


Despite pervasive optimism that the global economy has left the recession behind and is poised for solid future growth, the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) continues to trend lower. Recall, the BDI is a price index which tracks the cost to ship dry commodities.

Iron ore and coal have been the two large swing commodities in recent years. These are the main products carried by the Capesize ships (the largest ships which are too big to pass through the Suez or Panama canal and must therefore go around the Cape of Good Hope or Cape Horn), represented by the blue line in the chart above.

The stockpiling of iron ore by the Chinese in the first half of 2009 led to a very nice rebound in Capesize rates (following a 96% collapse), but virtually all of the gain since the beginning of the year has now been given back. Capesize rates are now nearly identical to rates for the smaller Panamax and Supramax vessels. This seems to confirm the anecdotal evidence we've seen of pig farmers stockpiling copper as well as recently declining steel prices in China.

This weakness in the BDI does not support a resurgent global economy thesis, but it's just one variable. New ship deliveries, the rate of mothballing, and product stockpiling will all impact shipping rates along with demand. So, we must be careful not to read too much into it. Still, it would be foolish to ignore this real-time indicator of economic activity which has now been steadily falling for nearly 4 months.

The stock market is now pricing in a vibrant recovery and strong earnings growth. If this rally is to continue or if the gains are to be held, it's now "show me" time. Indicators such as the BDI which rely on more than just government stimulus to move their needle will need to start registering some impressive gains to substantiate the stock market rally. I suspect that investors will soon be forced to recognize that a deleveraging private sector won't be contributing much to economic growth any time soon. The question then turns to how long the government will be willing or able to sustain its immense stimulus measures.



The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Saturday, August 8, 2009

Quote Of The Day: Geithner And The Debt Ceiling

It should come as no surprise that the Treasury is once again asking Congress to boost the debt ceiling as we're fast approaching the current $12.1 trillion limit. Of course, we can expect Congress to again open the retractable roof of this ceiling and comply with Geithner's "request." I was particularly amused by the following quote.

From a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid:
"It is critically important that Congress act before the limit is reached so that citizens and investors here and around the world can remain confident that the United States will always meet its obligations" - Tim Geithner

So, if I've maxed out my credit card it only makes sense that my credit card company further boost my credit limit so that my other creditors can remain confident in my debt-paying ability. Right.



The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Friday, August 7, 2009

Chart Of The Day: Baltic Dry Index

While the market is busy rallying on backward-looking news, few seem to have noticed that the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) appears to again be rolling over. The BDI measures shipping prices of various dry bulk cargoes and is a solid indicator of what is actually and currently happening in the global economy.

The index had benefited recently from a rebound in commodity purchases (particularly iron ore) by China. However, it is likely that Chinese fiscal stimulus may have led to a stockpiling of ore which will need to be worked down. The recent weakness in the BDI may be corroborating this view. This is one to watch.







The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Sunday, July 26, 2009

With Leaders Like These...

Another wonderful example of the brain trust leading our country to financial ruin. Is it any wonder that Stark represents the great and bankrupted state of California? Stark must be thrilled with the massive "wealth" increase we've experienced this last year.





link to video


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Good News On Weekly Claims?

There are plenty of positive headlines this morning about the decline in the number of people collecting unemployment insurance. Here are the opening paragraphs of a Bloomberg article:

The number of Americans receiving claims for unemployment benefits dropped for the first time since January, adding to evidence the job market is starting to thaw.


The number of people collecting unemployment insurance plunged by 148,000 in the week to June 6, the most since November 2001, to 6.69 million, the Labor Department said today in Washington. Initial claims rose by 3,000 to 608,000 in the week ended June 13, in line with forecasts.

The average number of claims over the last four weeks fell to the lowest level in four months, an indication that the U.S. economy is stabilizing after the worst recession in half a century. Even so, companies are likely to be slow to hire new employees, sending unemployment rates higher, analysts said.

It never ceases to amaze me how articles are spun based upon prevailing psychology. When the market is rising, all news is good news and vice versa.

In fairness, perhaps this is evidence that the labor market is beginning to thaw. However, there is another explanation that isn't being discussed. Unemployment insurance doesn't last indefinitely. Maybe what we're seeing is people falling out of the program because they've exhausted their benefits. This is no less plausible than the bullish spin, yet it has tremendously different implications for the economy.

It's interesting to note that the weekly claims number did not fall. Shouldn't we expect to see this if the labor market is thawing?


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Monday, June 8, 2009

Sowing the Seeds

Too few people understand the role that the Federal Reserve has played in creating the bubbles of the past decade. Loose monetary policy, which is once again being heralded as an economic panacea, is creating a perceived improvement in short-term conditions at the expense of longer-term economic soundness. This game of kicking the can down the road can not continue indefinitely. Federal Reserve "success" will only lead to an even larger mess before long. As was the case in 2001, the necessary and inevitable readjustment will be less painful if it occurs sooner rather than later.





Click here if the video is not visible.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Friday, May 8, 2009

April Employment and The Joy of Birth

The headline from Bloomberg states, "U.S. Loses 539,000 Jobs, Fewer Than Forecast, in Sign Economy Stabilizing." After looking through the release, I have just a couple of comments.

First, expectations were for a loss of 600,000 jobs. The better-than-expected result can be attributed to the addition of 72,000 government jobs, with most of those jobs being added at the federal level. This is hardly surprising given the record spending coming out of Washington. It probably took 72,000 people just to spell check the budget. Our ever-expanding federal government is hardly a source of strong future economic growth.

More significantly, the Birth/Death model registered its largest monthly gain of the past 12 months. In the midst of the worst recession since the Great Depression, the government birth/death model has projected that 226,000 jobs were created in April. 76,000 jobs were apparently "born" in the leisure and hospitality sector, despite hotel occupancy rates plummeting. I suppose if we count all of the Craigslist ads for "personal massages" that might make sense. Back all of these assumed jobs out of the total and we're left with a loss of 765,000 jobs in April.

But you won't read about this 765,000 loss because all is right with the world again. The banks are stress-free, consumer confidence is rising, housing is bottoming, we're in a new bull market, and debt and non-performing assets are oh so yesterday.

Disclaimer: The Rubbernecker is once again shorting select U.S. equities.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Friday, May 1, 2009

Why There's So Little Outrage

According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the federal government is projected to spend $1.8 trillion more than it takes in this year. Next year, expenses are projected to exceed revenue by another $1.4 trillion. $1.8 trillion is equal to the entire amount of revenue generated by the federal government as recently as 1999. 10 years later, it's equal to the amount we're spending in excess of revenue.

This $1.8 and $1.4 trillion is just the beginning. The CBO estimates that our cumulative deficits will run to over $9 trillion over the next decade. The figures are simply astounding. Where will all of this money come from? It will be borrowed. That borrowed money eventually needs to be repaid.

Let's be clear about this deficit, our debt, and the steady stream of bailouts. These are inter-generational transfers of wealth. We are "saving" and "rescuing" those who have failed in some capacity, and we are expecting our children to pay the cost. For a moment, let's forget about whether these deficits will "work" to strengthen the economy (they won't), and let's forget about the future economic consequences of this massive borrowing binge. Where is the discussion of fairness? Where is our sense of decency? Where is the outrage?!

I suppose it's hard to feel outraged if you can't even quantify the magnitude of the problem.

How Many Millions are in a Trillion? from Econ4U on Vimeo.



The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Nice Pop - Confidence Up?

I just saw the market pop 1% and went looking for some news (even though a 1% move is practically noise these days) . I immediately noticed a CNN story about a fish that swallowed a cell phone. With fish now eating cell phones, an entirely new source of demand appeared to be opening for the phone manufacturers. This would clearly be a boon to them and their suppliers, so the market pop seemed to make sense. Just imagine how quickly we could rebalance the global economy if we could also start feeding fish our excess cars, malls, mortgages, and economists. This theory was somewhat marginalized when I saw that the consumer confidence figures for April were just released.

It seems the cause for the pop was the Conference Board's Expectations Index which rose from 30.2 in March to 49.5 in April. We can't get into the heads of those surveyed to figure out just why they've become more optimistic (actually, less pessimistic), but it should be safe to assume that the 25%+ gain in the stock market since March 9th played a fairly significant role. The steady blather from the banks that they're in great shape, and the stream of reports from the media that the economy is bottoming were also likely influential.

Unfortunately, this indicator, like many, is of limited value. It doesn't correlate well with consumer spending, and consumers are about as accurate at predicting the path of the economy as the economists are (translation: not very). Like many economic indicators, the confidence figures had been in free fall. No one should have been expecting that rate of decline to continue. We would all be feeding ourselves to the fishes in another 6 months. A bounce is certainly not a bad thing, but buying stocks because lemmings with no money feel less bad AFTER the market has had a nice rally is probably not a great idea.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Saturday, April 4, 2009

March Employment - Still Hard To Take Seriously

The March employment numbers came out yesterday, and the headline numbers were in-line with expectations. 663,000 jobs were lost, and the unemployment rate jumped to 8.5%. The Obama administration is modeling an unemployment rate of 8.9% by the end of the year. For us not to blow past that figure we're going to need to see a serious moderation in the pace of job losses, a hefty increase in the civilian labor force (the denominator of the unemployment rate), or a healthy dose of government data manipulation.

Speaking of data manipulation, the job loss figure for January was revised down by 86,000 jobs, a 13% revision two months after the fact. Interestingly, the February number was not revised -- yet. Also, the birth/death model (which I've written about previously) registered an increase of 114,000 jobs in March. It claims that 23,000 construction jobs were "born" last month. They must have been counting the people constructing tent cities across the country.




The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Monday, February 23, 2009

Curse Of The Contrarian

It's so ugly out there, it's hard not to be a little bullish. My contrarian sympathies have certainly been helpful in avoiding complete disasters over the years and have been instrumental in all of my most profitable investments. But everything has a cost. The curse of the contrarian is often being early in your calls, sometimes quite a bit early. That has always struck me as a very fair trade.

With the global economy now in tatters, stock markets hitting fresh multi-year lows, and journalists jockeying to see who can use the word "depression" most often in their articles, the contrarian in me is starting to feel a little frisky. Perhaps the stars are aligning for a nice rally. For today's exercise, we'll temporarily set aside all of the doom and gloom (of which I've contributed my share over the years), and we'll take a look at a few positive developments.

  1. We can argue about the merits of the stimulus (and I've been against it from the start), but there's a good deal of monetary and fiscal stimulus on the way. The authorities have made it clear that they will stop at nothing to "fix" the economy. Ignoring the potential longer-term negative consequences of their prescription, the current and future stimulus (yes, there will be more) will show up in the economy.
  2. Stocks in the U.S. are now off about 48% from their highs. Much bad news has been discounted.
  3. Bearish sentiment has been climbing again. The herd of bulls is thinning and those remaining are far less vocal.
  4. The Leading Economic Indicators rose for 2 straight months. Yes, it can be explained away, but at least it rose.
  5. The money supply has been rising at a healthy clip. True, it isn't making it's way into the economy -- yet. That could change sooner than expected.
  6. On a related note, there is a great deal of cash sitting on the sidelines, waiting for a little more clarity and confidence to move back into risky assets.
  7. On a related note, the fixed income markets have been showing some signs of life recently.
  8. Once again, a number of pundits are questioning Buffett's investment acumen. That's usually a good contrary signal.
  9. New housing starts are plummeting. This will help with the excess housing inventory problem. It will still take more time, but it's happening.
  10. Companies have been fairly quick to reduce costs in this downturn, and corporate balance sheets were in pretty good shape going into it. Once business finally does pick up, we could see some rapid margin expansion.
  11. Based on a number of different metrics, equity valuation looks much more reasonable. We're hardly at bear market lows, but some metrics are at levels not seen in a couple of decades.
  12. The market has fallen 14% since February 9th. It sure feels like we're oversold near-term.
That was refreshing. Again, this is not a bottom call. In the near-term, we are oversold. Markets don't go straight down. It would be more surprising to me if we didn't experience a rally imminently.

In recent days, I've added a little more market exposure, reduced our already small short position, and reduced our gold position (still one of our larger holdings). Gold is due for a healthy pullback after its recent rise, and I suspect a rally in the market may result in a decline in gold as safe haven buying temporarily wanes. Should this occur, I'll be rebuilding the gold position again.

The odds favor any rally being a trading opportunity. In the meantime, I'll enjoy basking in my relative bullishness.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Saturday, February 14, 2009

So, Where Are We Now?

I appreciate all of the inquiries as to my disappearance lately. I'd love to report that I've been relaxing on a beach on a remote telecommunications-free island in the Caribbean, but client business, trading, earnings season, and a beautiful, laughing, 4-month old daughter have kept me very busy these past few weeks. As earnings season slows I hope to have a little more time for the Rubbernecker, sleep, and personal grooming.

I certainly haven't avoided writing due to a lack of material! Let me try and catch up with the past few weeks and recap where we stand.

  • As we know, the Fed has driven interest rates to ridiculous below-market rates.
  • These low rates are devastating for the savings of retirees who have no business moving out on the risk curve in search of higher yield.
  • These low rates are also supposed to encourage more borrowing despite the fact that our economy is currently suffering from too much debt.
  • Congress is angry that the banks aren't lending their bailout funds to people who already have too much debt in the middle of some type of economic "ession."
  • Congress is criticizing bankers for paying themselves too much, over-levering their balance sheets, and maintaining huge off-balance sheet liabilities while Congressfolk continue to pay themselves too much, over-leverage our nation's balance sheet, and maintain huge off-balance sheet liabilities.
  • The collective earnings of the S&P 500 companies will register its first decline ever in the fourth quarter of 2008. Ever.
  • Congress just passed a $787 billion stimulus plan that will further increase our national debt and displace private investment. The notion that this and future stimulus is only temporary and will be withdrawn once the economy recovers is laughable.
  • Over $8 trillion in spending/promises have been incurred in the past year.
  • We have a Treasury Secretary in charge of both the financial industry bailout and the IRS who either isn't smart enough or honest enough to do his own taxes properly.
  • This same Treasury Secretary just announced an eagerly-awaited financial bailout plan that included no details and no plan aside from somehow spending a lot more money.
  • The Obama administration is now working on some scheme to "save" the housing market. Whatever the details of the plan, we can be sure it will entail using the tax dollars of those who were prudent to "rescue" those who made bad choices. It will also impede the housing market finding a bottom.
  • This year's Federal budget deficit is creeping towards $1.5 trillion, and is sure to rise further as tax receipts continue to fall.
Debt, Debt, and More Debt
Simply put, this massive increase in debt is an inter-generational transfer of wealth. In other words, we're doing this for our own current "benefit" and will be passing the bill to our children. Where's the discussion of fairness? With every bailout of the past year, our leaders have told us that we must act immediately or the global economy will collapse. That hasn't left much time for educated discussion, nor has it prevented the global collapse that their swift undebated action was supposed to prevent. Last week, I explained to my 4-month old daughter that her share of the national debt is well over $200,000. You should have seen the diaper I had to change after that.

It amazes me how accepted it has become that the the cure for any slowdown of any magnitude is always to throw money at it. This is the policy that we've pursued consistently since the Great Depression, and look where it's gotten us. There's a popular quote that seems rather appropriate. "If you keep doing what you've been doing you'll keep getting what you've been getting."

For far too long, our policy makers have increased and encouraged borrowing at every whiff of a slowdown rather than let the market correct the excesses that have built up. Each time, they managed to forestall what would have been a healthy correction at the expense of preordaining a more severe future correction. Ironically, now that it's time to pay the piper, our authorities are laying the blame on the failings of the free market instead of their constant meddling. Unfortunately, their actions will only prolong the length of this downturn.

As I've stated before, the good news is that the market is still doing its job, and many of the excesses (excluding government credit and money supply expansion) are gradually being cleared away. The housing bubble is unwinding, consumers are beginning to save again, global equity markets are back to far more reasonable levels, excess production capacity is starting to dry up, etc. This process will take time, especially with the massive level of government meddling, but it is occurring, and it will eventually take us to a healthier level of economic activity -- one not dependent largely on household credit expansion.

Stock Market Rally?
As ugly as the situation is, there is a strong likelihood that the fiscal and monetary stimulus being dumped on the economy will appear to have a positive impact. As counterproductive and inefficient as most of this spending will eventually prove, the stimulus will at least help slow the rate of decline, probably beginning in the second half of the year. In anticipation of this or at the earliest sign of this, we may experience a fairly strong rally in the equity market as investors come to believe that the worst is behind us. The expected "Obama rally" earlier this year was doomed from the start as too many people were expecting it and were looking to sell into it. With pessimism growing again and less talk of an impending rally, the odds of a rally have actually increased.

To the extent that the credit bubble has not been allowed to correct sufficiently, it's hard to imagine that any such rally will be the real deal. As discussed in prior posts, bear rallies can be powerful. The Great Depression saw a 50% rally over a 6 month period right in the middle of the first leg down. Barring a dramatic change in policy, any rally unaccompanied by a significant correction in the credit bubble is likely to prove a dead cat bounce.

The ballooning national debt and Fed balance sheet also need to be watched. I just can't see all of this stimulus being removed without collapsing any recovery we do eventually get. Government doesn't have a terrific track record of enacting temporary stimulus. Not surprisingly, it typically manages to morph into permanent funding. New constituents will be created who will create lobbying groups, and they won't take kindly to any future talk of decreased funding. The Fed will also find it difficult to withdraw the massive monetary stimulus it has injected. Once the printing presses are humming, it's very difficult to turn them off. Although much of the talk these days is of deflation, I see significant inflation as a much more serious threat down the road.

Strategy Update
As a result, current long-term Treasury yields strike me as unsustainably low. I had shorted the long end of the curve in mid-December and sold that position near the end of January. I didn't anticipate this being a short-term position, but we were fortunate to buy the position close to its low, and it experienced a 25% gain in just over one month. Hopefully, I'll get another crack at it. The Fed has discussed buying long-dated Treasuries. Should they follow through, I would expect another decline in long yields at which time I'll take a hard look at loading up again. Longer-term, this is a position I want to own.

Gold has typically been viewed as an inflation hedge, but it's been one of the best performers in this current deflationary phase (as it was during the Great Depression) as investors flock to its safety and low interest rates minimize the opportunity cost of owning gold. We've been overweight precious metals throughout the gold bull market and have continued to add on pullbacks. In early January, I bought a few junior mining names that had been driven to ridiculously attractive prices. More recently, I eased back on our GLD/DGP position in those accounts where the position grew just a little too large following this recent rally. We still own a healthy precious metals position and would be quick to add on any significant pullback.

Most of the balance of our aggressive portfolios hasn't changed significantly. Our bias at these levels is towards select emerging markets and commodities. I take a long-term approach with these positions and am quick to point out that I have no expectation for these positions in the short-term (less than one year). The countries I'm focusing on have already declined significantly, have experienced an outflow of hot money, are marked by high savings rates, have at least reasonably solid reserves, and are trading at attractive valuation levels. Five years from now, I expect to be pleased with their performance.

We still hold a decent cash position, and we continue to have just a few short positions as the recent leg down in the market has made it more difficult to find many compelling short opportunities. As usual, at the margin I would anticipate selling some long positions and increasing short exposure if we get a strong rally without signs of a significant positive change in the underlying fundamentals.

I think that catches me up from my relative absence the past few weeks. I now have to go explain to my daughter why she'll be learning Chinese and why her savings account is short the dollar. I'll be putting a second "backup" diaper on first.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Friday, January 30, 2009

Q4 GDP - Real GDP vs. Final Sales

I'm seeing plenty of headlines this morning highlighting how GDP supposedly came in much better than expected at down 3.8% (annualized) versus an expectation of down in the 5-5.5% range. As always, the devil is in the details.

Not too surprisingly, personal consumption and private investment both fell significantly, -3.5% and -12.3% respectively. The key figure in understanding the headline number, however, is the change in inventories. Real inventory growth in the quarter had the effect of adding 1.32 percentage points to real GDP. When we ignore this inventory build, we get a figure known as final sales. Final sales fell 5.1% in the quarter.

Inventory was reduced by $50.6 billion in the second quarter and $29.6 billion in the third quarter. Why did inventory grow in the fourth quarter? It can most likely be attributed to a weak holiday selling season combined with a little too much optimism. Retailers didn't sell as much as they hoped, so they ended the quarter sitting on extra inventory which left excess inventory at the wholesaler/manufacturer level.

Why is this important? If an inventory build occurs to prepare for future growth then there shouldn't be a problem. However, to the degree that any increase in inventory can not be met by demand, we are effectively borrowing production from a later period.

The bottom line is that an inventory build that isn't met by current demand will result in lower future GDP since production will need to be scaled back to reduce the excess inventory. It's kind of like getting an advance on your paycheck. Your income may have technically gone up today, but that "loan" has to be paid back. With the global economy clearly slowing further over the past month, this "better than expected" GDP report will likely lead to a weaker report next quarter -- at least weaker than it would have otherwise been.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

The Output Gap II - Revenge Of The Anti-Keynesians

Here's a timely follow-up to yesterday's post, "The Output Gap." The Obama administration may be surprised to learn that not all economists are Keynesians. Not all economists believe that the right course of action is to throw unseemly amounts of borrowed or "printed" money around.

The Cato Institute is running an ad with the signatures of quite a few economists to combat the belief that everyone believes that fiscal stimulus is the correct path. It was nice to see a few names from my alma mater on the list. I also couldn't help but notice that, just like our friend Paul Kr_gm_n, there were a couple of individuals on the list who at one point shook hands with the King of Sweden.

Link to the ad



The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Monday, January 12, 2009

Some Nice Local Press

Over the past couple of weeks, the Cary News, the Raleigh News&Observer, and WRAL each published/aired a story about my involvement in helping the town of Cary with its investment portfolio last year. I wasn’t looking for or expecting any acknowledgment, so the press coverage has been a pleasant surprise.


There are two factual points to clarify. First, although the article refers to my “gut feel”, my concerns came from a detailed analysis of Fannie and Freddie's balance sheet as well as my expectations for a deteriorating housing market. I leave hunches and inklings to more trivial matters like whether to have a baby or which wild berries to eat.


Second, the article and TV clip mention that I sold positions in Fannie and Freddie for myself and my clients. The fact is that I never owned these stocks. I actually shorted (bet that the share price would fall) Freddie Mac (FRE) shares back in March for myself and clients. The concept of shorting can be a little difficult to grasp, and I suspect the reporters were busy enough trying to figure out if there was any possible lighting scheme that would make me look remotely presentable.


The TV news segment was filmed with virtually no notice, so I'm grateful to the WRAL team for their generous and thoughtful editing. I have a new respect and understanding for just how quickly and efficiently a news crew is able to pull a story together and get it on the air. Of course, I'm also grateful to the town's finance department for taking my concerns seriously.


TV segment: http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/4235053/


Newspaper article: http://www.newsobserver.com/news/wake/cary/story/1345473.html





The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Monday, December 22, 2008

Government Revenue Creep

I concluded my November 25th post ("Who Doesn't Enjoy A Good Spending Spree?") with the following comment: "This has been the enduring failure of Keynesian economics. Everyone loves a good spending spree. No one ever wants to take away the punch bowl."

The following graph (courtesy of Greg Mankiw) does a wonderful job of illustrating this. The rapid increase in government revenue relative to GDP in the early 1940's was due to World War II. The more interesting observation, though, is that this temporary increase in the size and scope of government was never reined in following the war. Instead, the government's share of economic activity has continued to grow over the past 60 years.



It would be naive to think that our government will ever proactively address the growing deficit and debt (on and off balance sheet) problem that we face. As has typically been the case, our leaders won't act until forced to, at which time we may be faced with a serious decline in the value of the dollar and/or the arrival of hyperinflation. Some combination of less government expenditure, higher taxes, lower entitlement spending, higher inflation, reduced entitlement benefits, and a weaker dollar are what ultimately await us. What we don't know are the exact contents of this poisonous cocktail or the timing of its arrival.

As for the investment ramifications of this, I would expect dollar weakness and gold strength. Assuming reasonable global growth, I would expect many commodities to perform well, and select international equity markets with better growth prospects and better fiscal restraint should handily outperform the U.S. (assuming reasonable valuation). Much of the U.S. fixed income market would be destroyed, although TIPS would certainly benefit.

Not coincidentally, many of our core long-term positions would benefit from such a scenario. Also consistent with this thesis, I recently added a long Canadian dollar and short U.S. Treasury (20+years) position. I'll spend a little more time on each of these later this week.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

"Hall"f Baked

I have nothing against Glenn Hall of TheStreet.com personally. I know nothing about him. I'm sure he's a nice guy, but I can't believe some of what he writes. I'm starting to think that TheStreet.com doesn't have an editing staff.

Glenn writes a piece for TheStreet.com that he calls "Today's Outrage." As you can probably surmise, Glenn proceeds in each article to rant, complain, or disgrunt about his topic-du-jour. My turn. I recently read a couple of his pieces that made my jaw hit the floor.

The first one is from today's article entitled "Today's Outrage: Sears Isn't Worth $4 Billion." Glenn writes:
How can Sears be worth $31.84 a share? Target fetches only $29.54, and JC Penney is down to $16.55.

At the other end of the retail spectrum, investors are only paying $6.41 for Macy's, and at the low end, Family Dollar Stores are only trading at $26.

Wal-Mart is one of the few higher-valued competitors, with its shares at $53.

So I have to ask: Who thinks Sears is better than Target or even JC Penney for that matter?

The outrageous spread between Sears' share price and better-positioned retailers may be due for a correction after investors digest today's earnings report from Sears. The company reported a loss of $146 million for its third quarter, which ended Nov. 1, and said sales fell at both its Kmart and Sears chains in the U.S.
This is scary. We're talking Stock Investing 101. Trying to compare the value of different companies by looking at only their stock prices is beyond absurd. Price alone is irrelevant. If you're going to compare equity values of different companies you need to consider how many shares of stock are outstanding. Sears isn't "worth" $31.84 a share. Sears is worth $4 billion (market value). Sears trades at $31.84 a share because Sears has a market value of $4 billion, and the company has 126.4 million shares outstanding.

What would happen if Sears did a 2-for-1 stock split tomorrow? The share count would double to 252.8 million shares, and the price of the stock would decrease by 50% to just under $16. I suppose that this would satisfy Mr. Hall since SHLD would then have a lower stock price than Target, JC Penney, and Family Dollar Stores. Nothing fundamental would change, however. Sears would still have a market value of $4 billion, but for some reason Mr. Hall would be more satisfied with the "spread" between the various share prices. This is the kind of mistake someone completely unfamiliar with stocks might make.

For the record, the following are the market values of the companies mentioned by Glenn:
  • Target: $21.7 billion
  • JC Penney: $3.6 billion
  • Family Dollar Stores: $3.6 billion
  • Macy's: $2.7 billion
  • Wal-Mart: $208 billion
The second piece by Hall that caught my attention is entitled "Today's Outrage: Google-O-Meter Signals Doom." Glenn writes:
The true sign of how bad it's going to get comes from Google, which is throwing its contract workers to the wolves.

The Internet search giant and ultimate barometer of consumer behavior says it will significantly reduce the number of its roughly 10,000 contractors in anticipation of a worsening economy.

No problem here. Clearly, this is yet another anecdotal sign of a weakening global economy. At the same time, good for Google. One of the knocks on the company has been its free-spending ways. If business is slowing, costs need to be cut, and reducing contract workers strikes me as a logical and reasonable place to slice. Glenn continues:

It may be the right thing to do from a fiduciary perspective, but the folks at Google don't seem to realize how damaging it is to the psyche of consumers and investors alike to see the ultimate growth machine scaling back.

He should have quit after "perspective." It's most certainly the right thing to do from a fiduciary perspective. Why in the world should Google be worried about the damage "to the psyche of consumers and investors?" This is investment analysis that only Dr. Phil and Karl Marx could like.

Is Google owned by shareholders, or is it a federal agency? Why is it up to Google to single-handedly repair investor psychology? Maybe Glenn would like Google to ramp up spending and hiring to the point at which net income will be wiped out and the stock completely destroyed (more so than it has already). I wonder what that would do to investor psyche?

I had bought some Google just before their last earnings report and sold it shortly thereafter, so I have no current position in Google. I do, however, applaud the company for getting serious about the cost side of its income statement. This will certainly help them to sustain strong free cash flow generation during the downturn. The day Google or any company starts basing its decisions on "investor and consumer psyche" is the day I short that stock.

Disclosure: The Rubbernecker is long simple math and short Dr. Phil.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Monday, December 1, 2008

It's "Officially" A Recession

Well, I was off by a month. The organization responsible for dating economic recessions, the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), has finally come out and declared that we've been in a recession since December of 2007. It only took 11 months of deteriorating economic data, the collapse of some of our largest financial institutions, the shuttering of the credit markets, a housing bear market, and a 50% decline in the stock market to confirm this.

The same press release confirmed that Obama won the election, Santa Claus is not real, the earth revolves around the sun, and Elvis is most likely dead. I can see why this is a nonprofit organization.

Disclosure: The Rubbernecker is long Elvis and short most economists.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.