Showing posts with label Recession. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Recession. Show all posts

Monday, June 8, 2009

Sowing the Seeds

Too few people understand the role that the Federal Reserve has played in creating the bubbles of the past decade. Loose monetary policy, which is once again being heralded as an economic panacea, is creating a perceived improvement in short-term conditions at the expense of longer-term economic soundness. This game of kicking the can down the road can not continue indefinitely. Federal Reserve "success" will only lead to an even larger mess before long. As was the case in 2001, the necessary and inevitable readjustment will be less painful if it occurs sooner rather than later.





Click here if the video is not visible.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Monday, December 1, 2008

It's "Officially" A Recession

Well, I was off by a month. The organization responsible for dating economic recessions, the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), has finally come out and declared that we've been in a recession since December of 2007. It only took 11 months of deteriorating economic data, the collapse of some of our largest financial institutions, the shuttering of the credit markets, a housing bear market, and a 50% decline in the stock market to confirm this.

The same press release confirmed that Obama won the election, Santa Claus is not real, the earth revolves around the sun, and Elvis is most likely dead. I can see why this is a nonprofit organization.

Disclosure: The Rubbernecker is long Elvis and short most economists.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Who Doesn't Enjoy A Good Spending Spree?

Like good little Keynesians, countries around the world are whipping out their nearly maxed-out credit cards in an effort to boost economic growth. It's easy to understand why. You can't expect much of a boost from consumption, housing, business investment, or exports. The only lever left to pull is government spending. And since governments aren't capable of just getting out of the way and letting excesses correct themselves (as they should), we're sure to see unprecedented growth in budget deficits and government debt in the next couple of years.

The U.K., for example, has recently announced its fiscal stimulus plans. Their budget deficit is projected to double next year and then increase another 50% in 2010, leading to a projected budget deficit that is greater than 8% of GDP - a personal best for the U.K.

Just as in the U.S., this eventually has to be repaid in the form of higher taxes and/or lower spending. This has been the enduring failure of Keynesian economics. Everyone loves a good spending spree. No one ever wants to take away the punch bowl.





Disclosure: The Rubbernecker is long gold and short the dollar and the plundering of our children's financial security.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Friday, November 7, 2008

State and Local Feeling The Pain

The economic decline is starting to impact state and local budgets in a meaningful way. With almost every state having a balanced budget requirement (ex Vermont), any state budget shortfalls will have to come from tax increases or spending decreases. It should come as no surprise that I strongly favor expenditure cuts. The problem with tax hikes during a downturn is twofold. First, you're asking (telling) people to pay more at a time when they have less to pay. Second, these hikes are seldom if ever rolled back once the economy begins to grow again.

When times are good, government programs proliferate. And when times are bad, government programs still seem to proliferate. Perhaps when times are really bad, government may finally be forced to retrench. As much as I'd like to believe that any move to smaller government expenditures would be permanent, the wool just doesn't stretch that far over my eyes.

Below are a few of the headlines from just the last 24 hours. This list is by no means exhaustive.

"
Schwarzenegger asks for $4.4 billion tax hike" - USA Today
"Philadelphia Makes Big Cuts to Help Close a Budget Gap" - NY Times
"Bad Budget News in Kansas" - Kansas City Star
"Granholm's executive order will cut state budget" - Crain's Detroit Business
"Election hangover: State Democrats face $3 billion budget hole" - Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
"More trimming as NC budget expected to worsen" - Forbes
"Nickel a drink to save state budgets" - MarketWatch
"Big Apple starting to crumble" - Financial Post
"Arizona officials plan for special budget session" - Forbes
"Toledo council may rotate trash pickup over holiday weeks" - Toledo Blade
"$1.8M cut from Norwalk operating expenses" - The Advocate
"Elgin cutting jobs to save $5 million" - The Courier News
"State's flow of red ink deepens as it runs up $2B in new debt" - NJ Star-Ledger
"State Revenue Down in Declining Economy" - WMUR New Hampshire
"San Diego mayor proposes drastic budget cuts" - San Jose Mercury News

Disclosure: The Rubbernecker is short wool eye masks.


The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Monday, November 3, 2008

American vs. Chinese Bankruptcy

Hat tip to my friends over at Calculated Risk for bringing the following LA Times article to my attention, "Some owners deserting factories in china."

First, Tao Shoulong burned his company's financial books. He then sold his private golf club memberships and disposed of his Mercedes S-600 sedan.

And then he was gone.

...As more factories in China shut down, stories of bosses running away have become familiar, multiplying the damage of China's worst manufacturing decline in at least a decade.
I don't want to condone disappearing bosses who run off with whatever cash remains and leave behind unpaid employees and suppliers, but there is a simple beauty and efficacy to this process. Capacity is immediately taken out of the market.

Entering this global downturn, it is clear that many industries are suffering from an excess of global production capacity given declining demand. One of the things needed for the global economy to find some support is for production capacity to adjust lower to meet the new lower demand. Basically, factories need to be shut down, and the sooner the better. The fact that Chinese capacity can disappear overnight is actually a good thing for rebalancing the global economy, especially since much of the excess capacity that was built in recent years was built in China.

When these Chinese bosses disappear and their factories are shut down, that production is gone. Contrast that with the typical U.S. corporate bankruptcy. In the U.S., a troubled company files for bankruptcy "protection" and continues to produce. Typically, the stockholders are wiped out, and the bondholders are given new equity in the company in exchange for their debt. Then, the company emerges from bankruptcy, often with a production footprint not terribly different from its pre-bankruptcy days.

So, not only is it likely that zero to modest capacity was taken out of the system, but now the remaining competitors in that industry are facing this "new" old competitor which has a clean balance sheet and can more aggressively compete on price. This puts added pressure on the "survivors" who may have been fairly conservative and done everything right, but nevertheless now face a stronger competitor that would have been liquidated in a true free market. There's probably no better example of this than the U.S. airline industry.

We can bad mouth the Chinese bosses who are leaving their employees and suppliers in a bind, but at least they've found a way to quickly address the excess capacity overhang.

Disclosure: The Rubbernecker is long disappearing Chinese bosses and short the U.S. bankruptcy code.

The Market Rubbernecker is affiliated with Aspera Financial, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Please read the disclaimer on the home page of the Market Rubbernecker site.

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

GDP-U


First quarter GDP came out today and showed the economy grew at a whopping .60% rate, the same as last quarter and the slowest pace since the fourth quarter of 2002. It's difficult to know what to do with these releases since they come from the biased government and are often significantly revised well after the fact. However, the market pays attention to it, so we have to pay attention to it. It's a silly game. We all know the figures are manipulated and heavily revised, but since we think others are trading on the data, we'd better too! Game theory run amok.

The bulls will take some solace in the "fact" that we haven't seen the two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth that some still look for to define a recession. Either way, it's clear that the economy has at least stalled out over the past 6 months.

Keep in mind that real GDP takes out the effect of inflation, so the lower the government's estimate of inflation, the better the real GDP looks. For the first quarter, inflation was estimated to be running at a 3.5% pace. Had that estimate come in a little higher, real GDP would have been negative. Given the government's use of hedonic pricing and rent-equivalency for estimating housing inflation/deflation, they can pretty much manufacture whatever number they want.

More striking is the fact that all of the GDP growth last quarter can be attributed to an increase in inventory. GDP measures the value of that inventory even though an increase in inventory means more product is sitting on shelves and may prove to be a drag in future quarters. If you take out the change in inventory, you're left with what's called final sales. This is a purer measure of what actually happened in the quarter. This figure fell .20% last quarter. This is only the fourth time this decade that this figure fell below zero.

As for other contributors, it's no surprise that net exports helped boost GDP for the fourth straight quarter as the dollar has been declining. Personal consumption registered its slowest growth rate since the second quarter of 2001. Residential investment once again took a good chunk (-1.23%) out of GDP.

All in all, this isn't a particularly cheery report. For the balance of the year, consumption and investment are likely to remain weak while net exports and government spending add some support. I imagine the bulls and the press will make a fuss over the fact that GDP came in positive, but I doubt this report will have much of an impact on the Fed's interest rate decision this afternoon.

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Britain's Coming Real Estate Bust

The real estate troubles we've been experiencing here in the U.S. aren't at all unique to us. Many a European flat, chateau, and villa experienced a similar or greater bubble during this decade, and they're now starting to retrench as well. Home prices are falling and mortgages are more difficult to come by as many banks are (rationally) requiring higher credit standards and larger down payments, if they're willing to lend at all.

Britain seems to be just a bit behind us on this credit/housing unwind. Discretionary spending is likely to at least moderate as credit availability suffers and inflation continues to rise. We should expect to see a slowing in European real economic growth. The most interesting question just may be how our recession and a slowing in Europe would affect Asia. I'll address this in another post.

The Europeans do have one big advantage over us. If things get really bad for them they can take advantage of the weak dollar, move to the States, and buy a mansion in Cleveland for what it costs them to fill an SUV back home. Of course, they'd have have the distasteful choice of working as either as debt collector or a political strategist since these are about the only jobs available here.

From the TimesOnline:

House prices fell for the second consecutive month in March, according to official figures released today.

The Land Registry figures, which show that the average cost of a home in England and Wales dropped by 0.4 per cent in March to stand at £184,798, will add to growing fears that the UK is about to suffer a significant slump in the housing market.

The Land Registry also revealed that housing market transactions averaged 81,926 a month between October 2007 and January 2008, which was down 25.5 per cent year-on-year. Sales volumes were also weakening more markedly at the end of this period, as they were down 39.2 per cent year-on-year in January at 53,221.

Howard Archer, chief UK economist at Global Insight said: "We now expect house prices to fall by 7 per cent in 2008 and 9 per cent in 2009. Furthermore, the longer the credit crunch goes on and the deeper and longer the UK economic slowdown is, the greater the danger will be that an even sharper housing market correction will occur.

"Current rapidly deteriorating sentiment over the housing market also heightens the risk that house prices could fall more sharply over the next couple of years. Consequently, it is very possible that a drop of more than 20 per cent in house prices could occur over the next couple of years.

The official figures came as a leading estate agent suggested that house prices could fall by as much as 25 per cent if the credit crunch persists, with the market declining by 10 per cent this year and by a further 15 percentage points in 2009.


From the BBC:

The slowdown in the UK mortgage market continued in March, according to figures from the Bank of England.

It said the number of new mortgages approved for house purchases in March fell to a record low of 64,000, down from 72,000 the previous month.

This was the lowest level since the bank started collecting the data in April 2003, and was down 44% on the figure for the same month in 2007.

However, credit card and other lending increased in March from February.

A global credit crunch has caused lenders to put up prices on mortgages and withdraw mortgage deals, especially for those unable to put down a significant deposit, in recent months.

The credit crunch, when banks are less willing to lend to each other and consumers, was caused by problems in the US housing market, which saw a surge in mortgage defaults and a drop in property values.

In the UK, property prices have also started to dip during 2008, according to various housing surveys.

"The news that mortgage approvals dropped to a record low of 64,000 is hardly surprising given that lenders have been aggressively scaling back on the provision of finance to homebuyers," said Simon Rubinsohn, chief economist at the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (Rics).

The Bank also reported a drop in loans approved for remortgaging, down 11,000 in March from the previous month at 98,000, and for other purposes such as buy-to-let, down 6,000 at 57,000.

Saturday, April 26, 2008

Is the Coast Clear - Again?



Over the past month, we've seen the S&P 500 (first chart) rebound by about 11%, and we've seen the volatility index (second chart - measures expected market volatility over the next 30 days) decline markedly from last month's high. It's no surprise that over this same period the "experts" have once again been coming out of the woodwork to proclaim that the worst is behind us and that this is a great buying opportunity. Of course, many of these gurus never noticed this huge credit bubble building or foresaw its demise. Regardless, CNBC doesn't hesitate to reserve plenty of air time for their endless droning.

For the sake of fairness, there's always a chance that we have seen the worst, and there's a chance that the stock market could rally to new highs and beyond this year. There's also a chance that professional lawn bowling will take our country by storm or that a global tone deafness virus will sufficiently affect the population to allow me to become the next American Idol.

In my humble and increasingly out-of-favor view, what we are witnessing is standard bear market activity. As discussed in an earlier post, just as bull markets are marked by the occasional 10%+ retrenchment, bear markets experience the occasional 10%+ rally. Sentiment swings violently and on a dime. One minute, everyone is fearing Armageddon and the next everyone is shoving Granny out of the way to get in "at the bottom".

Why my continued pessimism? Here is a brief summary of a few concerns:

  • Economic growth in recent years was fueled largely by an ever-increasing amount of debt rather than through savings. This was never sustainable long-term and is finally reversing.
  • Consumers became increasingly reliant on extracting equity from their homes this decade in order to fund their lifestyle. With home prices off sharply and mortgage availability far more limited, this source of "income" is largely gone.
  • Higher oil prices are likely here to stay. Though they could dip somewhat in the face of a global economic slowdown, the longer-term trend is likely to be higher as high depletion rates and limited significant exploration success fail to keep up with growing demand.
  • Roughly 70% of GDP comes from consumer spending. The consumer is stretched to the max as evidenced by soaring foreclosure rates and credit card defaults. In addition, wage growth has been anemic. It's time for the consumer to start saving and rebuild his/her balance sheet.
  • The housing market is likely to be weak for much longer than most expect. Sales are plummeting and inventory continues to grow. In the hot markets that experienced the most overheating, asking prices still bear no relation to rents - as they should. Ultimately, prices will need to fall to levels that make houses more affordable for homeowners or to levels at which investors can rent them out for a positive cash flow.
  • We haven't even begun to see the impact of Option ARM defaults. These will be rolling to higher interest rates in the next couple of years, and it's likely that the loss experience of these homeowners won't be terribly different than that of the subprime lot.
  • State and local budgets are going to become a big issue. With tax receipts falling and expenditures remaining high, many states will be faced with some hard choices given their balanced budget mandates. Taxes will need to be raised and/or spending cut.
  • Banks remain very hesitant to lend. Liquidity is king. There is plenty of corporate debt coming due in the next couple of years, and it will be crucial for companies to roll this debt over at reasonable rates. Otherwise, interest expense will increase and/or shareholders will experience dilution as more companies are forced to sell stock to redeem their debt.
  • The losses banks have taken thus far have been largely mark-to-market accounting related losses. Once the slowing economy begins to impact the general economy, we will see increasing corporate defaults.
  • More and more companies are lowering their capital expenditure plans and announcing layoffs. Clearly, the financial industry is currently experiencing a net outflow of jobs. This will likely start to trickle through much of the rest of the economy this year.
  • Inflation continues to surge, regardless of what the corrupt government statistics indicate. We all know what we're paying for gas, food, utilities, education, health care, etc.
  • With the dollar weakening and inflation rising, it wouldn't be surprising if our lenders (China, Japan) soon started demanding a higher interest rate on their government security purchases. This would help the dollar but wreak havoc on an already weak economy.
Even with all of these issues, stocks could be a buy for those with a longer-term outlook if valuation were attractive enough. If I believed that stock prices more than adequately discounted all of the above concerns, I would be bullish. Unfortunately, that just isn't the case. As with most investments, you make your money when you buy. History has clearly shown that the initial valuation of stocks is a terrific guide to future returns. The lower the initial valuation the better the future returns - in general. Currently, we're still at the high end of the historical range of valuation. The P/E for 2009 is up in the mid-teens. Given all of the problems cited above, this hardly strikes me as a compelling entry point for the market as a whole. History has shown that future returns tend to be anemic when starting from these levels (just look at the last 10 years).

I do believe that, although the bulls are back in control for the moment, we will look back at this rally and see that it was another dead-cat bounce (bear market rally). Near-term, I intend to add to select short positions. The stock market has held up well so far during this earnings season, but this is more a function of expectations having been set unreasonably low going into the earnings reports. When you expect Armageddon but end up with purgatory that looks like good news. I expect a fairly ugly pre-announcement season for next quarter and will increase my shorts leading into it should the market continue to move higher and sentiment remain bullish.

Sunday, April 13, 2008

Stiglitz and the Charmin Prescription



Nobel Prize winner, Joseph Stiglitz was on CNBC this past week offering his views of the current economic situation. Stiglitz is calling for a further 10-20% decline in house prices and the worst recession since the Great Depression. No argument here. He does a nice job of explaining why this recession is not your typical run-of-the-mill downturn.

Where I take issue with him is on his policy prescriptions. He (like most) is calling for a "more effective stimulus package - bigger, better design..." More specifically, he'd like to see an expansion of unemployment insurance because he feels it offers the biggest bang for the buck in terms of the stimulus you get per dollar of spending and because "it's a lack of jobs, not a lack of searching for jobs that's the problem."

He then brings up the issue of budget stress that states and municipalities will be undergoing as their balanced budget requirements require them to reduce their spending as their revenue (think property taxes, capital gains taxes, income taxes, sales taxes) falls. This is an important issue which hasn't received much attention - yet. However, he then goes on to say, "We need to have a program to stop this downturn by supplementing the income, making up for the loss of revenue. It wasn't their fault. It's the fault of macroeconomic management at the federal level."

So basically Stiglitz (like virtually all of the other pundits) just wants to bail everyone out. If you lost your job and you couldn't find a new one (or weren't willing to take a step down in pay or prestige) in 26 weeks, no problem. We'll just keep cutting you a check. Is your state struggling because current tax revenue can't support the expansion in services it approved over the past 5 years? Don't bother raising taxes or even contemplate cutting spending. We'll just cut you a check. Calm down. No need to worry about being fiscally conservative. We'll be cutting you a check. And for you states who've been the most fiscally irresponsible we'll be sending you the biggest checks of all!

Of course, the "we" is the federal government which is you and me and all of our other fellow taxpayers in this country. And, I suppose that we should consider the fact that
the we don't have the money laying around to do these things, so we would have to borrow billions on top of our already staggering debt load. And I suppose we should be concerned that increasing our borrowing from our already unsustainable level is ultimately going to cost us in terms of a weaker dollar, rising inflation, higher taxes, smaller future entitlement benefits, and/or rising interest rates. And maybe we should think about the implications for moral hazard if we keep collectively wiping this country's hindquarters every time its bowels get a little shaky.

Nah. We'll just cut a check.

Saturday, April 12, 2008

Recession Watch - Consumer Sentiment


The latest reading of the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index is the lowest we've seen since the early 80's when inflation was soaring and Volcker was busy jacking up the Fed funds rate to 19%.

At least Bernanke is now talking about the chance of a recession. The talking heads are almost always behind the curve. The issue isn't whether we're in a recession but rather how long and deep it will be.

The only reason there's been any debate at all as to whether we've been in a recession is because of the manipulation of inflation statistics by the government. The real GDP figures reported by the government are overstated due to their ridiculously low calculation of inflation. The lower the inflation figure, the higher the reported real GDP.

Consumption accounts for about 70% of U.S. economic activity, and the U.S. consumer is clearly in retrenchment mode. I expect this recession will be longer and/or deeper than the consensus view. Therefore, it's likely still too early to bottom fish in the consumer discretionary sector.